Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi all.

If $G$ is a finite group and $\varrho : G \to \text{GL}(V), \eta : G \to \text{GL}(W)$ are finite dimensional representations, $V_0$ is a $G$-invariant subspace of $V$ and $f : V_0 \to W$ is a homomorphism of representations, i.e. a homomorphism of vector spaces satisfying $f(\varrho(g)x) = \eta(g) f(x)$,

Question: is there any theory on the question whether or not this homomorphism can be continued to whole $V$?

Phrasing differently: How 'many' values of a homomorphism of representations can one prescribe?

Clearly, there is the theory of induced representations but unfortunately, in my case, it is not true that $V = \oplus_{g \in G} ~ \varrho(g)V_0$, neither is the sum direct nor does equality hold.

Providing more details: In my case, $G$ is $\text{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/N\mathbb{Z})$, say $\text{SL}_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$ for the beginning. $V$ is a certain group ring $\mathbb{C}[D]$ where $D$ is a discriminant form, i.e. $D=L'/L$ for some lattice $L$ that satisfies some properties (non degenerate, even, even signature, determinant is a $p$-power for the beginning, ... [i.e. all simplifications that seem senseful/necessary]), $\varrho$ is the Weil representation and $W$ is a certain subspace of $X = \mathbb{C}[D] \oplus \mathbb{C}[D'] \oplus ...$ i.e. a finite direct sum of the original group ring with some other group rings of other discriminant forms. The representation on $X$ is the direct sum of the Weil representations of the single discriminant forms.

Thanks in advance,

Fabian Werner

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You don't explicitly say your representation is complex but I think your example shows that this is the case you're interested in. If so, then $V_0$ has a $G$-invariant complement $V_1$ by Maschke's Theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maschke%27s_theorem, and the unique linear extension of $f$ whose kernel contains $V_1$ will be a homomorphism of representations $V\to W$ extending $f$.

share|improve this answer
No need to restrict to complex representations. One just has to assume that the characteristic of the field does not divide the order of $G$. –  Vít Tuček May 15 '13 at 15:21
That's right. –  Simon Wadsley May 16 '13 at 9:40
@Simon: Thank you very much. That was more simple than i thought. –  Fabian Werner May 16 '13 at 11:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.