MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A\rightrightarrows X$ be a groupoid, where $X$ is the set of objects and $A$ is the set of arrows. My favorite example of a groupoid is an action groupoid. If a group $G$ acts on the left on a set $X$, we set $$ A=\{(x,g,y)\mid x,y\in X, g\in G,\ y=g*x\}, $$ then $A\rightrightarrows X$ with the evident maps is called the action groupoid corresponding to the action of $G$ on $X$. It is often denoted by $G\ltimes X$.

Let $F\colon (A\rightrightarrows X)\to (B\rightrightarrows Y)$ be a morphism of groupoids (a functor). We say that $F$ is an equivalence of groupoids if it is an equivalence of categories.

Let $x\in X$. We denote by $A(x)$ the set of arrows $a\colon x\to x$. We denote by $\pi_0(X)$ the set of connected components of $X$ (i.e., the set of equivalence classes in $X$ with respect to the equivalence relation induced by $A$). We say that a morphism $F$ as above is a weak equivalence of groupoids (or a quasi-isomorphism) if $\pi_0(F)\colon \pi_0(X)\to \pi_0(Y)$ is a bijection and, for any $x\in X$, the induced homomorphism $F_x\colon A(x)\to B(y)$ is an isomorphism, where $y=F(x)$.

Question 1. Is it true that any weak equivalence of groupoids is an equivalence?

Now assume that a group $\Gamma$ acts on our groupoid $A\rightrightarrows X$. We say that $A\rightrightarrows X$ is a $\Gamma$-groupoid. My favorite example of a $\Gamma$-groupoid comes from an action of an algebraic group $\mathcal{G}$, defined over a field $k$, on a $k$-variety $\mathcal{X}$. Let $k_s$ denote a separable closure of $k$, then we set $\Gamma:={\rm Gal}(k_s/k)$, and we consider the action groupoid $\mathcal{G}(k_s)\ltimes\mathcal{X}(k_s)$, on which $\Gamma$ acts.

By a weak equivalence of $\Gamma$-groupoids we mean a $\Gamma$-functor $F\colon (A\rightrightarrows X)\to (B\rightrightarrows Y)$ that is a weak equivalence of groupoids. By an equivalence of $\Gamma$-groupoids we mean a $\Gamma$-functor $F\colon (A\rightrightarrows X)\to (B\rightrightarrows Y)$ such that there exists a a $\Gamma$-functor $F'$ in the opposite direction and each of the composite functors $F\circ F'$ and $F'\circ F$ is $\Gamma$-naturally-isomorphic to the corresponding identity functor.

Question 2. Is it true that any weak equivalence of $\Gamma$-groupoids is an equivalence of $\Gamma$-groupoids?

I expect the answer "No" to Question 2, but I cannot construct a counter-example.

share|cite|improve this question
The braces that I typed in the displayed formula are not visible! Maybe somebody can edit the formula to make the braces visible... Thank you, – Mikhail Borovoi May 15 '13 at 13:05
@Mikhail Just use \left\\{ instead of \left\{ and \\{ instead of \{ etc. (Demo: $\left\\{\right\\}$ vs. $\{\}$) – The User May 15 '13 at 13:35
In comments it works differently—strange. – The User May 15 '13 at 13:35
@The User: Thank you for the answer and the editing suggestion! – Mikhail Borovoi May 15 '13 at 13:52
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The answer to question 1 is “yes” since every weak equivalence is essentially surjective (let $y\in Y$, $[y]$ the connected component of $y$, which is in the image of $\pi_0(F)$, thus there exists $y^\prime\in [y]$ which is an element of the image of $F$ and isomorphic to $y$) and full and faithful (since $F_x$ is an isomorphism, the mappings $F_{xy}\colon A(x,y)\to B(F(x),F(y))$ are also bijective, choose $f\in A(y,x)$ then $\alpha\colon A(x,y)\to A(x), g\mapsto fg$ and $\beta\colon B(F(x),F(y))\to B(F(x)), g\mapsto F(f)g$ are bijections and $F_{xy}=\beta^{-1}\circ F_x\circ \alpha$ is bijective).

As a counter example for question 2 consider: $\Gamma=C_2$, $X$ the “complete” (in the sense of graph theory) groupoid consisting of two objects and four isomorphisms. The action of $\Gamma$ on $X$ is defined to swap the objects. Let $Y$ be the terminal groupoid consisting of a single isomorphism. $\Gamma$ acts trivially on $Y$. The unique morphism $X\to Y$ is a weak equivalence of $\Gamma$-groupoids. But there does not exist a $\Gamma$-morphism $Y\to X$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.