MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\lambda$ be a singular cardinal. Is it consistent that there is a forcing of size $\lambda^+$ that collapses $\lambda^+$ while preserving all cardinals below $\lambda$?

(Note that even without the size requirement this implies a failure of the Jensen covering property, so such a forcing does not necessarily exist.)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer is no and it follows easily from the following theorem:

Theorem. Suppose $\kappa$ is a regular uncountable cardinal and $|P|\leq \kappa.$ Then $\Vdash_P cf(\kappa)=|\kappa|.$

For a proof of the theorem see Singularizing forcing of "small" cardinality?

share|cite|improve this answer

I think this is a consequence of stationary forcing. See P. Larson: The Stationary Tower, p. 60.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
Isn't the stationary tower forcing much larger than $\lambda^+$? – Monroe Eskew May 13 '13 at 15:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.