MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the best way to show, that $Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$ is abelian, where $\mathcal{A}$ is an abelian category and $\mathcal{Ab}$ is the category of abelian groups from scratch?

There is the canonical inclusion functor $S\colon Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})\rightarrow Func(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$, which should have a nice left-adjoint $T$ (somehow like sheafication). How does one construct this? What is the kernel of the left-adjoint?

I think this left adjoint should be exact and $T\circ S\cong id_{Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})}$, such that $Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$ is equivalent to the gabriel quotient $Func(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})/ker(T)$.

I would be glad if I get some answers to this questions, but I would love to hear some references from you, with wich I can prove this rigorously. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
It would be helpful that you explained the notation you're using. – Fernando Muro May 11 '13 at 17:45
Isn't this notation quite common? $Lex(A,B)$ denotes the category of all left−exact functors from $\mathcal{A}$ to $\mathcal{B}$ and $Func(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{B})$ the category of all functors. – archipelago May 11 '13 at 17:55
Laumon (MR0726427) interpretes Lex as a category of sheaves on a site - whence it is abelian. The proof in Gabriel's dissertation I couldn't entirely follow. – Matthias Künzer Oct 24 '13 at 9:34
Yes, the class of epimorphisms in an abelian categroy forms a site and the sheaves of abelian groups on site site are exactly the left exact functors. Gabriel's elementary constructed left adjoint I mentioned in my answer then corresponds to the abstractly constructed sheafification-functor. – archipelago Dec 28 '13 at 22:33

Almost all of your questions are answered in Pierre Gabriel's dissertation "Des catégories abéliennes".

He shows in a more general case, that the left exact functors between nice abelian categories are abelian und constructs indeed an exact "sheafification"-functor $T$, which is the left-adjoint of the inclusion functor. Have a look at Proposition 4 on page 348.

After that, Proposition 5 on page 374 implies, that $Func(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})/ker(T)\cong Lex(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{Ab})$, what you already mentioned.

I think $ker(T)$ are the so called "weakly effaceable" functors, but I am neither completely sure nor do I know any reference for that. Maybe someone can help you with this point.

share|cite|improve this answer

I just wanted to take a second to post this paper:

In it, the author defines zeroth derived functors in abelian categories that do not have enough projectives or injectives.

A brief piece of it: Let $C$ and $D$ be abelian categories. Take the functor category $(C,D)$ and consider any subcategory $S\subset (C, D)$ and then the full subcategory of $S$ consisting of left exact functors in $S$, $Lex(S)$. There is the canonical inclusion $s: Lex(S) \rightarrow S$. We say $S$ admits a zeroth right derived functor if there is a left adjoint (say $r^0: S \rightarrow Lex(S)$) satisfying two properties (we'll call the map $s\circ r^0$ the zeroth right derived functor and relabel it $R^0$):

1) The unit of adjunction $u: 1_s \rightarrow R^0$ is an isomorphism on injectives, and

2)The 'other'composition, $r^0\circ s$ is isomorphic to the the identity functor of the full subcategory of left exact functors of $S$. (The paper says something different, namely that $r^0\circ s \cong 1_S$. Based on the direction of the arrows, that composition should land in the $Lex(S)$.

In general, the unit of adjunction has a kernel and by evaluating the exact sequence

$0 \rightarrow \ker u \rightarrow 1_S \rightarrow R^0$

at $F$, a functor from $C$ to $D$, we recover a definition for the injective stabilization of a functor $F$, as defined by Auslander and Bridger in Stable Module Theory.

The author goes on to say that $r^0$ is a functor which takes functors $F$ and produces left exact functors $r^0F$. Then the inclusion $s(r^0F)=R^0F$ is the zeroth right derived functor of $F$, the result of making F left exact while changing as little as possible about the functor.

Now, all this being said, I did not write the paper, and I do not know much more about the details. I just think the paper is an interesting one.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.