MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $K$ be a degree $n$ extension of ${\mathbb Q}$ with ring of integers $R$. An order in $K$ is a subring with identity of $R$ which is a ${\mathbb Z}$-module of rank $n$.

Question: Let $p$ be an unramified prime in $K$. Is it true that the number of orders in $R$ of index equal to $p^r$, for some natural number $r$, is less than or equal to the number of subrings with identity of ${\mathbb Z}^n$ of index equal to $p^r$?

Nathan Kaplan and I need this fact for $n=5$ in a project where we are trying to find asymptotic formulae for the number of orders of bounded index in a given quintic field.

We've been staring at Jos Brakenhoff's thesis for a while, but I haven't gotten anywhere. Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Added in edit: Here is an elementary reformulation of this problem. Let $r(x)$ be a polynomial with integer coefficients. Then show that for any natural number $a$ in order to maximize the number of subrings of $({\mathbb Z}/p^a {\mathbb Z})[x]/(r(x))$ of a given index, the polynomial $r(x)$ has to be a product of linear factors modulo $p$.

Update: In a soon-to-be-posted preprint Nathan Kaplan, Jake Marcinek, and I have proved an asymptotic formula for the number of orders in a given quintic field of bounded discriminant, using an argument independent of the above question. We can also give non-trivial upper bounds for a general number field. I'm now convinced the answer to the question is yes, but I still don't know how to prove it.

share|cite|improve this question
Who voted to close? And why? – Marc Palm May 8 '13 at 17:05
Is it obvious that the elementary reformulation is the same, given that one is restricted to $p$ unramified and the other is not? – Will Sawin May 21 '13 at 2:05
It is clear that this question can be studied locally at $p$. In other words, this depends only on $R \otimes \mathbb Z_p$, so it depends only on $K \otimes \mathbb Q_p$, which is just a product of $p$-adic fields. – Will Sawin May 21 '13 at 2:31
In our work we only need this for unramified primes. – Ramin May 21 '13 at 18:58
I found a paper by Melanie Wood which might be relevant, although I did not check it carefully: – Frank Thorne May 21 '13 at 23:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.