MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a version of B├ęzout's theorem for non-proper intersections?

For my specific problem, the setup is as follows: Let $P_1,P_2,P_3,P_4\in\mathbb{C}[z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4]$, and suppose that (as a scheme) $\bigcap_{j=1}^4 \mathbf{Z}(P_j)$ is a 1-dimensional variety in $\mathbb{C}^4,$ plus some embedded points. I would like to say that the number of embedded points is at most $\prod_{j=1}^4 \operatorname{deg}(P_j)$. Does anyone have a reference / counter-example for such a statement?

I would be happy to lose a constant as well; a bound of $O\Big(\prod_{j=1}^4 \operatorname{deg}(P_j)\Big)$ would be fine too.

share|cite|improve this question
You would get what you want if you can show that all the embedded points are "distinguished components" of the intersection in the sense of Fulton. See the refined Bezout theorem in Chapter 12 of his "Intersection Theory". – ulrich May 8 '13 at 5:29
Thanks for this, Ulrich! Do you know if an embedded point being a "distinguished component" has a simple geometric description if my variety is an intersection of four hypersurfaces in $\mathbb{C}^4$? I took a look at Fulton, but it will take me quite some time to understand all of the language in it. – Josh Zahl May 8 '13 at 7:22
I don't know. If I have time to think about it I will add another comment later. – ulrich May 12 '13 at 9:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.