MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $K$ be a number field and $S$ a finite set of places of $K$. Then Shafarevich's theorem states that there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of elliptic curves $E$ over $K$ with good reduction outside $S$.

My question is whether the above holds when $K$ is the function field of an algebraic curve over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and $E / K$ has non-constant $j$-invariant?

share|cite|improve this question
In positive characteristic there are the Moret-Bailly pencils. – Jason Starr May 7 '13 at 17:53
Oops, Moret-Bailly's examples are pencils of Abelian surfaces, not elliptic curves. – Jason Starr May 7 '13 at 17:55
Yes. Let $U$ be the open affine curve away from $S$ over the constant field $k$. For any elliptic curve $E \rightarrow U$ there's a finite etale cover $U' \rightarrow U$ of universally bounded degree over which $E$ acquires a point of order 1728. Since $\pi_1(U)$ has only finitely many quotients of any given size, there are only finitely many possibilities for $U'$ up to $U$-isomorphism. Each connected component $U'_i$ of $U'$ has a specified map to $Y_1(1728)$ and it is dominant if $j(E) \not\in k$. There are only finitely many such maps since $X_1(1728)$ has genus $> 1$. QED – user28172 May 7 '13 at 20:09
@nosr: nice answer! Why post it as comment? There are however two points I didn't understand: 1) why is the degree of $U'\to U$ universally bounded? 2) your proof shows that given $p:E\to U$ we can associate to it a pair $(f:U' \to U, g:U'\to X_1(1728))$ and that there are finitely many such pairs, but I fail to see why there can't be infinitely many $p:E\to U$ to which the same pair $(f, g)$ is assigned - i.e. there could be many ways of descending $g*(\mathcal{E})$ along $f$, where $\mathcal{E}\to X_1(1728)$ is the universal curve. – Piotr Achinger May 8 '13 at 1:35
I think the following problem is lurking in the background here: the action of the automorphism group of $K$ on $j$. In order to get finiteness statements, this group should be seen to be finite (eg when $K$ is the function field of a curve over a finite field). – Damian Rössler May 9 '13 at 7:40

I don't know if this would be of any help but there is a nice paper of Bandini, Longhi and Vigni ( that contains a proof for admissible elliptic curves over global function fields of characteristic $p>3$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.