MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

(I'm happy to work over an algebraically closed field....)

Let $\mathcal{C} \rightarrow Spec (R)$ be a (flat) family of proper, prestable curves where $R$ is a DVR. Suppose the generic fiber is smooth and the special fiber, $C_0$, is reduced but may be reducible.

Given a finite map of curves $f_0: D_0 \rightarrow C_0$ with $D_0$ also prestable, can this be extended to some map on some family?

That is, is there a flat family of proper curves $\mathcal{D} \rightarrow Spec(R)$ and an $R$-morphism $f: \mathcal{D} \rightarrow \mathcal{C}$ which reduces to $f_0$ on the special fiber?

Perhaps such an extension is possible only after a ramified cover of $Spec(R)$?

If so, can it be arranged that the generic fiber of $\mathcal{D}$ is smooth?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Stated as such, the question is really too vague. For example, if $C_0, D_0$ are smooth of genus bigger than 1, and $f_0$ is purely inseparable, then $f_0$ can not lift to $R$ (even after extention) if $R$ has characteristic zero. Actually, as the generic fibers of $\mathcal C$ and $\mathcal D$ are equal to $g(C_0)=g(D_0)$, this will contradict Riemann-Hurwitz formula.

In this survey paper you can find some sufficient conditions. For instance, the lifting property for finite generically étale morphisms of semi-stable curves are characterized.

share|cite|improve this answer
My comment "too vague" was for the first version of the question... – Qing Liu Jan 25 '10 at 22:04
I will take a look at this reference... what happens if I keep making the question more specific, like requiring $f_0$ to be separable, or else the genus is small? – mdeland Jan 25 '10 at 22:07
The answer for f_0 separable (=generically étale) is in the paper. What do you mean by small genus ? – Qing Liu Jan 25 '10 at 22:47
Say, g = 0 or g = 1. – mdeland Jan 25 '10 at 23:20
Ah great! Section 5 of your survey is exactly the kind of thing I was looking for. – mdeland Jan 25 '10 at 23:24

I don't think you can extend an arbitrary morphism, even if the curves are prestable.

For instance, if $C_0$ is a quartic with one node and the generic element is a smooth quartic then you do have a morphism from a smooth curve of genus $2$ to $C_0$ which does not extend, since any extension would map a curve of genus $2$ to a curve of genus $3$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Yes great point - let me ask only about prestable curves - so that the singularities are at worst nodes. – mdeland Jan 25 '10 at 21:51
I have slightly changed my answer to deal with prestable curves. – Jorge Vitório Pereira Jan 25 '10 at 22:31
Yes, your comment explains why the condition in Qing Liu's referenced paper above, 4.11a is a necessary one. Thanks! – mdeland Jan 26 '10 at 13:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.