Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to read Fritz John's article, here:

http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pdf_1&handle=euclid.dmj/1077490637

And for the proof of Thm 1.1 in page 303 he writes that one can easily verify the equation (7) is satisfied for $i=1,k=2$, is it really that easy, perhaps I am missing some symmetry here?

I got so far to:

$$[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \xi_1 \partial \eta_2 } - \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \xi_2 \partial \eta_1} ] \frac{v(\xi , \eta)}{\sum_i (\xi_i -\eta_i)^2} = $$

$$= \frac {\(\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial \xi_1 \partial \eta_2} -\frac{\partial^2 v }{\partial \xi_2 \partial \eta_1})|\xi-\eta| +2|\xi-\eta|^2[(\xi_2-\eta_2)v_{\xi_1}-(\xi_1-\eta_1)v_{\xi_2}]}{|\xi-\eta|^4}$$

Now somehow I need to calculate another several derivatives wrt to eqaution (6) in the paper, is there some easy way to calculate that I am missing, he writes that it should be easy... :-D

Thanks in advance, Alan.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

OK, I think I understand why this is so.

If I calculate the expression:

$$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \xi_1 \partial \eta_2 }(\frac{ v}{|\xi-\eta|})$$

I get an expression that doesn't depend on $\xi_1 \& \eta_2$ explicitly thus by interchanging variable $\xi_1 \mapsto \xi_2$ and $\eta_2 \mapsto \eta_1$ I get the same expression.

For the love of god it is easy... :-D

share|improve this answer
    
I believe I also spotted a misprint, on page 4 after Eq. (8) it should be: $$\frac{v(\theta \xi +(1-\theta)\eta,\eta )}{|\theta \xi +(1-\theta)\eta -\eta|} = \frac{1}{\theta}\frac{v(\xi,\eta)}{|\xi-\eta|}$$ They forgot $\theta$ in the LHS of the denominator. –  Alan Jun 11 '13 at 3:07
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.