MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let M be your favorite moduli stack over the field of complex numbers.

Is it reasonable to expect M to be a Deligne-Mumford stack?

I know this is true for the moduli space of curves of genus g, ppav's and K3 surfaces. I'm just wondering what I should expect when considering other moduli stacks.

share|cite|improve this question
Stable coherent sheaves are simple and so have a $\mathbb{G}_{m}$ of automorphisms. – dhagbert Apr 29 '13 at 22:00
My favorite is $Vect_{n,d}(C)$ of vector bundles on a curve of genus $g\geq 2$ of fixed rank and degree up to isomorphism. The automorphism group has positive dimension, hence not a Deligne-Mumford stack. Maybe what you should expect is to replace Deligne-Mumford by Artin. – Jeremy Pecharich Apr 29 '13 at 22:09
I'm voting to close this question as it has no real answer. Or maybe the answer is "it depends on your taste", and on the meaning of "favorite". – André Henriques Apr 29 '13 at 22:50
The problem is, one can define a moduli stack (which is Artin) for any groupoid in the category of complex manifolds. Generically these won't be étale, hence the stack won't be Deligne-Mumford. – David Roberts Apr 30 '13 at 3:44
Why voting to close? The question has a simple answer: 'no'. – Matthieu Romagny Apr 30 '13 at 8:14
up vote 7 down vote accepted

If the objects under consideration all have finite automorphism groups, you should expect your stack to be Deligne-Mumford. Otherwise, it isn't Deligne-Mumford; but that is no cause for alarm.

share|cite|improve this answer
It would be a bit more accurate to say "finite etale automorphism schemes" (though since offered just as an "expectation", perhaps one cannot insist on too much precision). – user28172 Apr 30 '13 at 23:24
As nosr points out, this answer is incorrect. For a very natural example, the stacks of Kontsevich stable maps are not (usually) Deligne-Mumford in positive characteristic. – Jason Starr May 1 '13 at 1:40
@Jason: For another example, $X_0(N)$ (appropriately defined as a proper flat Artin stack over $\mathbf{Z}$) is not Deligne-Mumford in characteristic $p$ when $p^2|N$. – user28172 May 1 '13 at 2:33
Correction: As userN points out, I missed the OP's hypothesis that the stack is defined over $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{C})$. For stacks over $\text{Spec}(\mathbb{C})$, I agree with Ravi: every algebraic stack with finite diagonal is Deligne-Mumford. This follows from Artin's theorems. – Jason Starr May 1 '13 at 10:20

No (per the many examples in the comments).

share|cite|improve this answer
The question specifies 'over the complex numbers', which rules out all of the examples listed so far. I think Ravi's right that we should expect DM in the case of complex algebraic objects with finite automorphism groups. – userN May 1 '13 at 3:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.