MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Say $K$ is a $n$-dimensional convex subset of $\mathbb R^n$ around the origin. Say we know $Vol_{n - 1}(\pi_{\theta^{\bot}}) K)$ where $\theta^\bot$ is the linear subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$ orthogonal to the point $\theta$ of $S^{n - 1}$, and $\pi_{\theta^{\bot}}$ is orthogonal projection onto that subspace; also, $Vol_{n - 1}$ is Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb{R}^{n - 1}$. Can we write $Vol_{n}(K)$ as an integral over $Vol_{n - 1}(\pi_{\theta^{\bot}}) K)$ (and say its derivatives with respect to $\theta$ etc). It is ok to include some kind of diameter function in the formula of $Vol_{n}(K)$.

share|cite|improve this question
One should be aware that for hyperplanes $H$, the measures of the intersection $K \cap H$ and the image of the orthogonal projection $\proj_H K$ can vary significantly (depending on the body $K$). I think one can expect an integral formula relating $vol_n(K)$ to something like $\int_{H hyperplane} \vol_{n-1} K\cap H$, but not so easily a precise integral formula $\int_{H hyperplane} \vol_{n-1} \proj_H K$. But maybe one just needs to soul-search through the estimates available in Burago-Zalgaller's "Geometric inequalities", e.g. the Bieberbach inequality (thm 11.2.1) or Loomis-Whitney(11.3.1). – J. Martel Apr 24 '13 at 18:39

If I understand the question correctly, no. In particular, for a curve of constant width, the width does not determine the area.

share|cite|improve this answer
We are not talking about arbitrary curve. We are taking about convex sets. In two dimensional case such a formula exists and known as Cauchy's formula. – pallab1234 Apr 25 '13 at 5:22
@pallab: can you offer a reference for this cauchy's formula (which must certainly be different than the usual complex analysis formula)? – J. Martel Apr 25 '13 at 6:19
Please have a look: Page 19 – pallab1234 Apr 25 '13 at 7:17
I see a formula for the perimeter there, not for the area. – Michael Renardy Apr 25 '13 at 10:55
$A(\Omega)=\int h (h+\ddot{h}} d\theta$. This is the formula for area not perimeter. It is at the end of page. 19. – pallab1234 Apr 25 '13 at 11:11

Have a look at: [JFM 34.0649.01 Minkowski, H. Volumen und Oberfläche. (German) Math. Ann. 57, 447-495 (1903)] and [MR0478079 (57 #17572)
Pogorelov, Aleksey Vasilʹyevich. The Minkowski multidimensional problem. Translated from the Russian by Vladimir Oliker. Introduction by Louis Nirenberg. Scripta Series in Mathematics. V. H. Winston & Sons, Washington, D.C.; Halsted Press [John Wiley & Sons], New York-Toronto-London, 1978. 106 pp.]

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.