Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It was proved by Jacques Dixmier (Sur les représentations unitaires des groupes de Lie algébriques, Annales de l'institut Fourier, 7 (1957), p. 315-328, doi: 10.5802/aif.73, MR 20 #5820 , Zbl 0080.32101 )

that algebraic groups over the reals, are type I. Is a similar result known for algebraic groups over non-archimedean local fields (possibly of characteristic 0)? I am only aware of the result by Bernstein

http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~bernstei/Publication_list/publication_texts/bernstein-P-tame-FAN.pdf

that reductive algebraic groups over non-archimedean local fields, are type I.

share|improve this question
    
Your first link doesn't work for me:( –  Marc Palm Apr 17 '13 at 12:08
1  
@Marc: Yes there is something weird with the link, that I couldn't fix. I put the reference instead. –  Alain Valette Apr 18 '13 at 11:04
    
    
Or for those not able to speak french: ams.org/mathscinet/search/… –  Marc Palm Apr 18 '13 at 11:12
1  
Thanks to David for reviving my question of 2 years ago. My reason for asking was a computation (joint with Henrik Petersen) of $L^2$-Betti numbers for locally compact groups, valid under a type I assumption; see arxiv.org/pdf/1307.0379.pdf –  Alain Valette May 16 at 17:11

1 Answer 1

Duflo gave a classification of the irreducible unitary representations of any algebraic group over a characteristic zero local field, in terms of the answer in the reductive case (Duflo, Michel Théorie de Mackey pour les groupes de Lie algébriques. (French) [Mackey theory for algebraic Lie groups] Acta Math. 149 (1982), no. 3-4, 153–213.) My guess would be that the type I result in general follows from Bernstein's type I result in the reductive case by Duflo's classification; but I don't know that for certain, and Duflo does not state such a result.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks David, welcome to MO! –  Alain Valette May 16 at 8:08
2  
The first question would be whether unipotent $p$-adic groups are all of type I. –  YCor May 16 at 9:19
    
@YCor: The answer is yes. unipotent p -adic groups are all CCR, in particular type I. See Theorem 4 "Decomposition of Unitary Representations Defined by Discrete Subgroups of Nilpotent Groups" by Calvin C. Moore jstor.org/stable/1970567?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents –  m07kl Jun 11 at 16:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.