# Absolute continuity of probabilities on Polish spaces and open sets. [closed]

On a polish space $\mathcal{X}$ i consider two Borel probabilities $P$ and $Q$ such that for any open set $E$ of $\mathcal{X}$ we have : $P(E) =0$ implies $Q(E)=0$. Does this imply that $Q$ is absolutely continuous with respect to $P$ that is, that for any Borel set $E$ of $\mathcal{X}$ we have $P(E)=0$ implies $Q(E)=0$ ?

-

## closed as off-topic by Nate Eldredge, Andrey Rekalo, Stefan Kohl, Ramiro de la Vega, Noah SteinFeb 19 '14 at 19:40

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center." – Nate Eldredge, Andrey Rekalo, Stefan Kohl, Ramiro de la Vega, Noah Stein
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

No: If $P$ is Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$, then $P(E) > 0$ for every open set $E$, and every probability measure $Q$ on $[0,1]$ vacuously satisfies your assumption. – Dan Apr 12 '13 at 12:45
Sorry i don't understand your answer, how does this prove that the claim is wrong ? – Polite Apr 12 '13 at 13:10

Your condition means precisely that the support of the measure $Q$ (the minimal closed set of full measure) is contained in the support of the measure $P$. Obviously it has nothing to do with absolute continuity.
There is a lot of pairwise singular measures with the same support. For instance, look at the distribution of the sum $$\sum_{k=1}^\infty x_k/2^k \;,$$ where $x_k$ are independent and take values 1 with probability $p$ and 0 with probability $1−p$. The resulting measures $m_p$ are pairwise singular (as it follows, for instance, from the law of large numbers) and have the same support $[0,1]$ (for $p=1/2$ this is the Lebesgue measure). – R W Apr 12 '13 at 13:47