Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi,

For a given $\theta < 1$, and $N$ a positive integer, I am trying to find an $x > 0$ (preferably the smallest such $x$) such that the following inequality holds:

$$\sum_{k=0}^{N} \frac{x^k}{k!} \leq \theta e^{x}$$

In my application, even $N$ is an integer function of $x$, i.e. $N = N(x)$, but for simplicity sake, let's assume $N$ is given for now.

Any ideas?

Thanks for reading

Fred

share|improve this question
    
You won't find an exact answer. However, the difference between the left side and $e^x$ is the tail of the Taylor series so can be expressed in many ways including as an integral. Bounding that integral will give you bounds on $x$. –  Brendan McKay Apr 12 '13 at 3:32
    
Thanks Brendan. I am going to play with this idea and see where I end up. Cheers –  Fred Apr 12 '13 at 5:39
    
and in fact this idea will lead exactly to the inequality that William suggested, see her remark below. So I am still on the square one! :-( –  Fred Apr 12 '13 at 6:13

1 Answer 1

The approach that looks most promising to me here is to use the incomplete Gamma function, $$ \Gamma(n, x) = \int_x ^{\infty} t^{n-1}e^{-t}dt = (n-1)!e^{-x}\sum_{k=0} ^{\infty} \frac {x^{k}} {k!} $$ for $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$. From this and your inequality, we get that $\frac{\Gamma(N+1, x)}{\Gamma(N+1, 0)} \le \theta$, or, equivalently, that your inequality holds wherever $\int_0^xt^Ne^{-t}dt \ge N!(1-\theta)$. Hope this helps.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks William, This was a great observation. In fact, this inequality came out of a more general inequality involving incomplete Gamma function. I was, specifically, trying to bound the CDF of a Chi-Square random variable. I was hoping to make the problem simpler by going to the series format, rather than integral. Cheers. –  Fred Apr 12 '13 at 5:42
    
The upper limit of the sum should be $n-1$ I believe. –  Brendan McKay Apr 12 '13 at 8:21
    
yes that is true. But the last inequality is OK....have not got any further with this one yet? Does anyone know of any tight upper/lower bound for the incomplete Gamma function? –  Fred Apr 12 '13 at 21:12
    
Tight upper/lower bound will be difficult without further information. For instance, if you are interested in $\theta \ll 1$, then $x$ will be large and you could try to use asymptotic approximations like dlmf.nist.gov/8.11 –  André Schlichting Apr 26 '13 at 12:14

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.