MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Leray number of a finite simplicial complex $K$ relative to a field $\Bbbk$ is defined to be the least $d\geq 0$ such that $\widetilde H^n(C,\Bbbk)=0$ for all $n\geq d$ and all induced subcomplexes $C$ of $K$.

The Leray number is the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of the Stanley-Reisner ring of $K$ with base field $\Bbbk$ and is also relevant to Helly problems in combinatorial geometry.

Question. Do people consider the Leray number with respect to arbitrary commutative rings (defined analogously), and in particular, with respect to $\mathbb Z$? Does it still have meaning with respect to Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity and Helly theorems?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.