MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$ and $M,N$ be $A$-modules. Can you give a quick proof that $\textrm{Tor}_i(M,N) \cong \textrm{Tor}_i(N, M)$ using derived categories?

In his Homological algebra book, Weibel proves this with an argument via a double complexes: the so-called "acyclic assembly lemma", and from what I understand this argument can be essentially reworded into the language of spectral sequences. Hartshorne's discussion (in "Residues and Duality") of derivatives of functors in two variables is quite short, but it's not clear to me if this result (commutativity of Tor) immediately follows from the relevant derived category formalism.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

Yes, the derived category of a commutative ring is symmetric monoidal $M\otimes_A^{\mathbb L}N=N\otimes_A^{\mathbb L}M$ and Tor is the homology of this tensor product.

share|cite|improve this answer
To relate this to the usual definition of Tor (derived functors of $M\otimes -$ or $-\otimes N$), presumably you need to show that the derived tensor product $M\otimes^L N$ can be computed by resolving only one of the two factors. Doesn't that require some kind of double-complex type argument? – Charles Rezk Apr 9 '13 at 14:22
You only need to know that cofibrant objects are flat, i.e. tensoring with a cofibrant object preserves weak equivalences. – Fernando Muro Apr 10 '13 at 21:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.