Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the book I am reading they write that for Hurwitz zeta function, $\zeta(x,s)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(x+n)^s}$, the next sum in the RHS converges for $\Re(s)>-1$, and I don't see how exactly?!

$$\zeta(x,s)-(\zeta(s)-sx\zeta(s+1)= x^{-s} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-s}[(1+x/n)^{-s} - (1-x/n)]$$

I think the sum converges for $\Re (s+1) > 1$ which means $\Re s >0$ and not $>-1$.

The reference is Andrews' et al Special Functions red book, page 17. http://books.google.co.il/books?id=kGshpCa3eYwC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Looks like there's a typo in your post. Andrews has $\left(1-\frac{sx}{n}\right)$ where you have $\left(1-\frac{x}{n}\right)$ in the rightmost term.

If you expand $\left(1+\frac{x}{n}\right)^{-s}$ as a power series in $\frac{x}{n}$, the series begins $1-s\frac{x}{n}+O(x^2/n^2)$. The first two terms are cancelled by the $-\left(1-\frac{sx}{n}\right)$, so the quantity between the square brackets is $O(n^{-2})$ as $n\to\infty$. This means the sum converges for Re$(s+2)>1$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.