Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How would you say that a small additive category $C$ embedds (contravariantly) into the category of exact functors from a 'large' abelian $C'$ into abelian groups (this is something like Yoneda's embedding, but $C$ does not map canonically into $C'$)? My problem is that I do not want to consider all functors from $C'$ into abelian groups since this functor category it 'very large' (and I do not want to consider a 'larger universe'). Certainly, I can try to consider a limit of the corresponding functors from small subcategories of $C'$; yet is there a better way to deal with this matters?

Upd. Actually, my $C'$ is just isomorphic to the category of additive functors from $C^{op}$ to abelian groups (though this is not the way how it is defined).

share|improve this question
    
Why not just take the Yoneda embedding on $C$ itself, or some appropriate small subcategory of $C'$ that contains $C$? –  Eric Wofsey Apr 8 '13 at 3:22
    
I don't have any reasonable small subcategory inside $C'$. I also recollected that my $C$ does not canonically map into $C'$; I only have a bifunctor $C\times C'\to Ab$. –  Mikhail Bondarko Apr 8 '13 at 4:15

1 Answer 1

In your example, there likely exists a cardinal $\kappa$ such that $C'$ is $\kappa$-accessible, as are the functors $C'\to Ab$ associated to each object of $C$ (i.e., they preserve $\kappa$-filtered colimits). In this case, you can consider $C$ embedded into the category of $\kappa$-accessible functors from $C'$ to $Ab$, which is only "large" rather than "very large". This is equivalent to restricting to the subcategory of $\kappa$-compact objects of $C'$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you! Sorry; I only just recollected that my $C'$ is isomorphic to the category of all additive functors from $C$ to abelian groups. So, the objects that come from an embedding of $C$ into $C'$ do yield compact generators. Yet are $k$-directed colimits suffice to obtain $C'$ from $C$? This is probably wrong for any $k$. –  Mikhail Bondarko Apr 8 '13 at 5:07
    
If $C$ contains less than $\kappa$ morphisms, then it should be easy to write any $C$-shaped diagram in $Ab$ as a $\kappa$-filtered colimit of diagrams in which all the abelian groups have size less than $\kappa$. Given any element of any of the groups of the diagram, just take the subdiagram that it "generates". –  Eric Wofsey Apr 8 '13 at 5:13
    
This may be easier to understand if you think about additive functors on $C$ as "modules" over $C$, generalizing the case when $C$ has a single object and is a ring. –  Eric Wofsey Apr 8 '13 at 5:16
    
Yes, this is quite correct! The category of $R$-modules is quite actual for me; yet I don't want to fix this setting. My problem is: I have a theorem that expresses $C'$ in terms of $C$, and I would also like to express $C$ in terms of functors that its objects induce on $C'$. Yet there are 'too many' functors from $C'$! –  Mikhail Bondarko Apr 8 '13 at 6:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.