2
$\begingroup$

For simplicity, just let G be GL(n) over real numbers, K=SO(n),K'=SO(n-1). Now if $\pi$ is an admissible representation of G with respect to K, i.e., any irreducible K-representation occurs with finite multiplicity.

Now the question I want to know that: does any irreducible K'-representation occur with finite multiplicity?

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

Not necessarily. For example if $n = 2$, then $SO(1)$ is the trivial group, and so if $\pi$ is infinite dimensional, it is the trivial representation of $SO(1)$ with infinite multiplicity.

Now suppose $n = 3$. The trivial representation of $SO(2)$ occurs with mult. one in every irrep. of $SO(3)$. So if $\pi$ is infinite dimensional, and so contains an infinite number of irreps. of $SO(3)$, then $\pi$ will contain the trivial representation of $SO(2)$ with infinite multiplicity.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Funnily enough, I wrote a paper, Cramped subgroups and generalized Harish-Chandra modules (published version:10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09421-5), about this question a few years ago.

The takeaway is that there is a geometric method for understanding when such a restriction is admissible. For many pairs of groups it never is, but I think Matt found the only examples of the form SO(n) and SO(n-1). In general, each finite dimensional representation of SO(n) comes from quantizing a coadjoint orbit, and you want only finitely many of the coadjoint orbits that lie in the image of the moment map on the contangent bundle of the sphere $T^*S^{n-1}$. In particular, $T^*S^1 \to \mathfrak{so}_2^*$ is surjective since $S^1$ is a regular action, and $T^*S^2 \to \mathfrak{so}_3^*$ is surjective since the adjoint representation is covered by the orbit of any line.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.