MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a basic question which I am not able to figure out. If we do a Gluck twist on a nullhomologous 2-sphere in a 4-manifold, it is said that it does not change its intersection form. But as far as I understand the Gluck twist changes the framings and knotting of the link components which represent the second homology. So why doesn't the intersection form change?

share|cite|improve this question
Have you tried computing the homology before and after the twist? I think that will answer your question. – Ryan Budney Mar 30 '13 at 17:37
the second homology will not change, I think because we are not adding or deleting any 2-handles. but the Gluck twist changes framings of 2-handles. So I don't see why still the intersection form is unchanged. – nikita Mar 30 '13 at 18:49
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Basically this is Lefschetz duality. Chopping out the neighbourhood of the 2-sphere gives a 4-manifold $X$ with boundary $Y = S^2 \times S^1$. You can think about the intersection form here and how this will change after the surgery.

The point of $S^2$ being null-homologous is that if you look at the long exact sequence on homology (say) of the pair $(X,Y)$ you will see that every element of $H_2(X,Y)$ is represented by a unique element of $H_2(X)$.

I think it's necessary that the $S^2$ be null-homologous, I would imagine that otherwise, a priori, the intersection form may change.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.