MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose that $X$ is a Polish space and $\mathcal{E}$ is the $\sigma $-algebra of subsets of $X$ with the property of Baire. Consider the product $\sigma $-algebra $\mathcal{E}\otimes \mathcal{E}$ on $X\times X$, which is the coarsest $\sigma $-algebra on $X\times X$ making the canonical projections $\mathcal{E}$-measurable.

QUESTION: Is it true that $\mathcal{E}\otimes \mathcal{E}$ contains all meager subsets of $X\times X$? (This would imply that $\mathcal{E}\otimes \mathcal{E}$ coincides with the $\sigma $-algebra of subsets of $X\times X$ with the property of Baire.)

share|cite|improve this question

Assuming that $X$ is an uncountable Polish space, the desired conclusion that $\mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{E}$ contains all sets with the property of Baire is not true. In fact, analytic sets have the property of Baire and it is a variant of a result due to Mansfield and Rao that no universal analytic set belongs to $\mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{E}$. See Miller, Measurable rectangles, Theorem 1 for a proof of this. In my answer to a related question on math.SE there are more explanations and further references.

share|cite|improve this answer
NB: this also tells us how to find a meager set that doesn't belong to $\mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{E}$: take a universal analytic set $A$ in $X \times X$ and take an open set $U$ such that $M = A \mathbin{\Delta} U$ is meager. Then $M \notin \mathcal{E} \otimes \mathcal{E}$. – Martin Mar 20 '13 at 23:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.