Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $U \subset \mathbb R^n$ be an open subset and let $f \colon U \to \mathbb R^m$ be a $C^\infty$ function. We suppose that $f$ is injective and that the differential $Df(x)$ is injective for all $x \in U$. Does it follow that the inverse function $f^{-1} \colon f(U) \to U$ is continuous?

The question is motivated by the fact that some authors require continuity of the inverse in the definition of a parametrized surface in $\mathbb R^3$ and some authors does not.

I think the answer is "no", but I cannot find an example.

Note: the answer below by trew is to a previous question of the question, where I wrote "$D(f)$ invertible" by mistake (in which case trew's is of course correct).

share|cite|improve this question
Now you've edited the question, how about $n=1$, $m=2$ and the map is from the open interval onto something which looks a bit like a letter "e"? –  user30035 Mar 19 '13 at 21:26
Yes, you're right, it was really really easy! –  John Mar 19 '13 at 21:33
I learnt this trick in my UG diff geom class; it probably has a completely standard name but if so, it escapes me. –  user30035 Mar 19 '13 at 21:41

1 Answer 1

Yes this is true since your map is open by the local diffeomorphism theorem. We can find for every $ x \in U$ an open $U_x $ such that f is a diffeomorphism from $U_x$ to $f(U_x)$.(i think we need that f is in $C^{1}$ not just differentiable)

share|cite|improve this answer
Can you please state a precise theorem? I don't think the answer is so easy. Note that the function starts from an open subset of R^n but the codomain is R^m, with possible m>n. Of course if f(U) admits a differential manifold structure the answer is yes, but in general I think the situation is more complicated. –  John Mar 19 '13 at 21:07
I think its called Inverse function theorem in english –  trew Mar 19 '13 at 21:12
Which version of the theorem are you using? Sorry to be pedantic, but can you write a precise reference? I know that "it is everywhere", but it always has some assumption that is not verified in my question. For example it is usually stated for functions R^n --> R^{n-p}. –  John Mar 19 '13 at 21:15 the fact that the dimension must be the same follows from you assumption that Df(x):R^n -> R^m is invertible(so you can use linear algebra to see that n=m) –  trew Mar 19 '13 at 21:17
I am very sorry I meant that D(f) is injective. I must be a little tired. Again, sorry. I edit the question, mentioning that your answer is to another question and it is, of course, correct. –  John Mar 19 '13 at 21:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.