MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have the following question. Consider a $2n$-dimensional almost complex manifold $M$. Assume that on $M$ there exists a complex valued $n$-form $\Omega$ and a $2$-form $\omega$ such that:

  1. $\Omega$ is locally decomposable, i.e. there exists $n$ $1$-forms $\theta_{i}$ such that $\Omega = \theta_{1} \wedge ... \wedge \theta_{n}$.

  2. $\Omega \wedge \omega = 0$.

  3. $|\Omega \wedge \overline{\Omega}| > 0$.

How can one show that $M$ admits an $SU(n)$-structure? I think to define charts and show that the transitions functions are elements of $SU(n)$. But how to define the trivialisations ?

Greetings hapchiu

share|cite|improve this question
Even with the right definition of $\mathrm{SU}(n)$-structure (which, as Ben points out, you don't have), you'll need more hypotheses than you have given. For example, your hypotheses allow $\omega=0$, which you surely don't want. You need (i) $\Omega$ is decomposable, (ii) $\Omega\wedge\bar\Omega\not=0$, and (iii) when you write $\Omega = \theta^1\wedge\cdots\wedge\theta^n$, then $\omega = (i/2)\ g_{k\bar l}\ \theta^k\wedge\overline{\theta^l}$ where $g = (g_{k\bar l})= (\ \overline{g_{l\bar k}}\ )$ is Hermitian positive definite and has determinant $1$. – Robert Bryant Mar 19 '13 at 19:04
(cont) Oh, and, with those hypotheses, you don't have to assume that $M$ has an almost complex structure, the form $\Omega$ satisfying the conditions (i) and (ii) define an almost complex structure on $M$, namely, the one for which $\Omega$ has type $(n,0)$. – Robert Bryant Mar 19 '13 at 19:08

An $SU(n)$ structure is not a collection of charts whose transition maps have derivatives valued in $SU(n)$. It is a collection of bases of tangent spaces, forming a principal $SU(n)$-subbundle of the bundle of all bases of tangent spaces. The forms you have specified uniquely determine (by pure linear algebra) a collection of bases of tangent spaces: the bases which are identified by linear isomorphism with the standard basis of $\mathbb{C}^n$ in such a way that these tensors are identified with the standard $SU(n)$-invariant tensors in $\mathbb{C}^n$. For example, you might look at Dominic Joyce's book Riemannian Holonomy Groups and Calibrated Geometry, Oxford University Press, pages 36 to 39, for more information. In fact, $SU(n)$-structures depend locally on $3n^2-1$ functions of $2n$ variables. The objects you were thinking of, given by transition maps with derivatives in $SU(n)$, are much more rigid, and are equivalent to flat $SU(n)$-structures. These are locally unique up to diffeomorphism and complex unimodular affine rigid motion of $\mathbb{C}^n$, so if we don't divide out by the diffeomorphism pseudogroup action, then flat $SU(n)$-structures depend on $2n$ functions of $2n$ variables locally.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.