Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

All free groups of finite or infinite countable rank are subgroups of the free non-abelian group $F_2$, which is linear. However, a free group of infinite uncountable rank will not be a subgroup of $F_2$. Is it linear, too ? This might easily follow from model theory, but I could not find a proof in the literature so far.

share|improve this question
1  
I believe that instead of using ultrafilters one can prove this by the compactness of first order logic by interpreting existence of a faithful representation as an infinite collection of first order statements in the theory of algebraically closed fields of characteristic 0 and then using compactness because any finite subset of these statements is satisfied by using the finitely generated case. Hopefully a model theorist will pipe in. –  Benjamin Steinberg Mar 19 '13 at 18:08
2  
Aren't ultraproducts and compactness of first logic are pretty much the same with different points of view? –  YCor Mar 19 '13 at 18:49
    
Yes, but there are proofs of compactness of first order logic that don't explicitly go through ultraproducts such as the original one via Godel's completeness theorem. But it is true that the compactness of first order logic is equivalent to the existence of non-principal ultrafilters if I understand correctly. –  Benjamin Steinberg Mar 19 '13 at 19:35

2 Answers 2

up vote 16 down vote accepted

Free group of rank $c$ embeds in $Sl(2, F(t))$ where $F$ is a field of cardinality $c$.

Edit: Here is the detailed argument which, as Yves noted in his comment, proves a stronger result.

Theorem. Let $L$ be a field which is not an algebraic extension of a finite field and let $c$ be the cardinality of $L$. Then the free group of rank $c$ embeds in $SL(2, L)$.

Proof. Let $P$ be the prime field of $L$; then $L$ has the form $$ P\subset E \subset L $$ where $E$ is a purely transcendenetal extension of $P$ and $L$ is an algebraic extension of $E$. Under our assumptions, $E$ and $L$ have the same cardinality, thus, it suffices to consider the case when $L=E$. Then $L$ is isomorphic to the functional field $L=F(t)$, where $F$ is a subfield of $L$. I will consider the case when $F$ is infinite since otherwise $L$ is countable and everything is clear (as the question reduces to the case of free groups of finite rank). Thus, $F$ has the same cardinality $c$ as $L$.

Let $T$ be the Bruhat-Tits building associated with $G=SL(2, L)$: This building is a simplicial tree with the path-metric $d$, where every edge has unit length. The group $G$ acts on $T$ by simplicial automorphisms with the kernel $\pm 1$. Detailed description and properties of $T$ and the action of $G$ are in Serre's book "Trees."

Let $v\in T$ be the vertex stabilized by $K=SL(2, O)$, where $O=F[t]$ is the ring of polynomial functions in $t$. Then the link $L_v$ of $v$ in $T$ is naturally identified with the projective line over $F$ (so that $K$ acts on $L_v$ by linear-fractional transformations). In particular, the group $K$ acts transitively on pairs of distinct points in $L_v$. Let $g\in G\setminus K$ be a diagonal matrix with the axis $\gamma\subset T$. Then $\gamma$ contains $v$ and $g$ acts on $\gamma$ as a translation by some even integer distance $\ge 2$. In view of transitivity of the action of $K$ on pairs noted above, there exists a subset $K_o\subset K$ of cardinality $c$ so that the elements $g_k=kgk^{-1}$, $k\in K_o$ have axes $k(\gamma)$ with the property that the 2-point sets $$ k(\gamma) \cap L_v, k\in K_o, $$ are pairwise disjoint. (Call this property D.) Now, I claim that the elements $g_k, k\in K_o$, are free generators of a free subgroup of $G$. The proof is rather standard. For each $k\in K_o$ let $D_k\subset T$ denote the Dirichlet fundamental domain for the cyclic group $\langle g_k \rangle$: $$ D_k=\{ x\in T: d(x, g_k^m(v))> d(x, v), \forall m\in {\mathbb Z} \setminus 0\}. $$ Since each $g_v$ translates $v$ at least by $2$, and in view of Property D above, the domains $D_k$ have pairwise disjoint complements. Thus, Tits' ping-pong argument (from his proof of the Tits alternative) applies in this setting and the subgroup of $G$ generated by the elements $g_k$ is indeed free with free generators $g_k$. qed.

Note that one has to exclude fields $L$ with are algebraic extensions of finite fields, since in this case the group $GL(n, L)$ is torsion (for every finite $n$) and, hence, cannot contain a free subgroup.

share|improve this answer
    
I guess you mean "any field $F$ of cardinality $c$". You don't need $t$, by the way, if you exclude $F$ algebraic over a finite field. –  YCor Mar 19 '13 at 19:05
    
Yves: Yes, I meant "any" field. The proof I have in mind is the same ping-pong on trees that one uses in the p-adic case, so I need a functional field $F(t)$ (or any discrete valued field whose residue field has cardinality $c$). –  Misha Mar 19 '13 at 20:01

Yes, it's a simple application of ultraproducts. Suppose that for fixed $d$, every finitely generated subgroup $H$ of a group $G$ has a faithful representation $j_H$ in $G_H=\text{GL}_d(K_H)$ for some field $K_H$. Then $G$ has a faithful representation into $\text{GL}(K)$, where $K$ is an ultraproduct of the $K_H$. Argue as follows: consider the lattice $I$ of all finitely generated subgroup. Consider an ultrafilter $\omega$ on $I$ containing, for every f.g. subgroup $H$, the set of subgroups containing $H$.

Then map $G$ into the ultraproduct $\ast^\omega(G_H)$ as follows: first extend $j_H$ to $G$ by defining $j_H(g)$ to be equal to 1 if $g\notin H$ (note that $j_H$ is a homomorphism only in restriction to $H$). Map $G$ into the product $\prod_H G_H$ by mapping $g$ to $(j_H(g))_H$. This is certainly not a homomorphism, but the composite map into the ultraproduct $\ast^\omega(G_H)$ is an injective homomorphism.

Now the ultraproduct $\ast^\omega(G_H)$ is canonically isomorphic to the group $\text{GL}_d(\ast^\omega K_H)$.

Finally this applies to free groups, but to many other groups, e.g. locally free groups and subgroups of ultraproducts of free groups, aka locally fully residually free groups. Note that if your group $G$ has a certain infinite cardinality, you can end up with a field of the same cardinality by restricting to the field generated by matrix entries of the image of your representation.

share|improve this answer
    
This argument shows that locally linear (of bounded degree) implies linear. In fact if I'm not mistaken, one can replace locally' here by fully residually': an easy modification of the argument establishes this. –  shane.orourke Mar 20 '13 at 21:35
    
One clarification: locally fully residually free groups account for all subgroups of ultrapowers of free groups, however not all subgroups of the latter are fully residually free: in particular ${}^\ast F_2$ itself is not residually free. –  shane.orourke Mar 20 '13 at 21:35
    
Thanks for the correction, I added "locally" before "fully residually free". –  YCor Mar 21 '13 at 9:10

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.