MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Good afternoon.

Can anybody give me an example of a continuous map $T:X\to X$ defined on a Polish space $X$ which admits an invariant Borel probability measure but no ergodic Borel probability measure? Typically, the space $X$ could be a separable infinite-dimensional Banach space, or the space $\mathbb N^{\mathbb N}$.

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 11 down vote accepted

The existence of such an example is prevented by the ergodic decomposition theorem, which asserts that every $T$-invariant measure on a standard probability space $(X,\mathcal{B},m)$ can be expressed as a (possibly uncountably infinite) convex combination of ergodic $T$-invariant measures by means of an integral over the set of ergodic $T$-invariant measures on $(X,\mathcal{B},m)$. In particular, since the integral must have a nonzero outcome the set of such measures is nonempty.

This theorem is relatively technical to prove and seems to be left unproved or even unstated in standard textbooks on ergodic theory. For example, Walters (p.34) describes the theorem without stating it formally, referring instead to the original work of V. I. Rokhlin (Selected topics in the metric theory of dynamical systems, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 4 (1949) 58--127). Petersen (p.81) mentions the result in passing but does not provide a reference. Aaronson's book on infinite ergodic theory gives a proof of the ergodic decomposition theorem for probability spaces in the case where $T$ is invertible (p. 62--64) and sets the case of general $T$ as an exercise; Aaronson attributes the result to von Neumann (who discovered it independently of Rokhlin) and cites Zur Operatorenmethode in der Klassischen Mechanik, Ann. Math. 33 (1932) 587--642.

Terence Tao's weblog has a nice discussion of the result here.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer! – Etienne Mar 9 '13 at 14:48
@Etienne Matheron: you should accept the answer to prevent the question to pop up regularly. – Benoît Kloeckner Mar 9 '13 at 14:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.