Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve over a field $k$. In chapter 8 of the book Neron Models by Bosch et al., there is a general result (namely Proposition 4) which implies that if $X$ admits a rational point, then the Picard functor which sends a $k$-scheme $T$ to $\text{Pic}(X \times T)/\text{Pic}(T)$ is already a (say, fppf) sheaf. What if $X$ does not admit a rational point? Is there a reasonably simple example which demonstrates that fppf-sheafification of this functor is necessary? Let's assume that the Brauer group of $k$ vanishes (e.g. $k$ finite) so that this is not an obstruction.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

There are such examples over some fields with trivial Brauer group, but not over finite fields. Let me explain why.

Over a finite field $k$, any geometrically integral variety $X$ has a zero-cycle of degree $1$. Indeed, by the Lang-Weil estimates, it has a rational point over the field extensions of $k$ of degrees $2^n$ and $3^n$ for $n\gg 0$, and these degrees are prime to each other. If $X$ is moreover proper, it follows that the Picard functor $T\mapsto \text{Pic}(X_T)/\text{Pic}(T)$ is already a fppf sheaf (and is moreover representable). When $X$ has a rational point, the argument given in [Néron models, 8.1, p. 203] uses the fact that the rational point induces a retraction of the natural pull-back map $\text{Br}(T)\to \text{Br}(X_T)$. But if there is only a zero-cycle of degree 1, it is still possible to construct such a retraction using restriction and corestriction maps for the Brauer groups, so that the argument still works.

On the other hand, suppose that $k=\mathbb{C}((t))$: this field has trivial Brauer group because it is $C_1$ by Lang's theorem. Let $C/k$ be a smooth geometrically connected genus $1$ curve whose minimal regular model over $\mathbb{C}[[t]]$ has a multiple special fiber, so that $C$ has no rational point. Then I claim that the functor $T\mapsto \text{Pic}(X_T)/\text{Pic}(T)$ is not a fppf sheaf. Indeed, if it were, it would be representable by the Picard scheme of $C$. In particular, there would be a Poincaré line bundle $\mathcal{L}$ on $C\times E$, where $E$ is the jacobian of $C$. Let $\bar{k}/k$ be an algebraic closure. Then $\mathcal{L}_{\bar{k}}$ is also a Poincaré line bundle realizing $C_{\bar{k}}$ as the jacobian of $E_{\bar{k}}$: in particular, there exists a unique $x\in C(\bar{k})$ such that $\mathcal{L}|_{E_x}$ is trivial. But if $y\in C(\bar{k})$ is in the Galois-orbit of $x$, $\mathcal{L}|_{E_y}$ also has a nowhere vanishing section, hence is also trivial, proving that $y=x$. This shows that $x$ induces a rational point on $C$, a contradiction.

As a last comment, if $k=\mathbb{C}((t))$, and $C/k$ is a smooth geometrically connected genus 2 curve, then $C$ necessarily has a degree $1$ zero-cycle, so that the Picard functor $T\mapsto \text{Pic}(X_T)/\text{Pic}(T)$ is already a fppf sheaf (and is moreover representable). For this and related results, see [Esnault, Levine, Wittenberg, Index of varieties over Henselian fields and Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves, Example 2.6].

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks so much, this is very helpful. I see how a rational point induces a retraction of the relevant map of Brauer groups, but would you mind explaining how a degree 1 zero-cycle does the same? If it makes things easier, I don't mind restricting to the case of a curve. –  Justin Campbell Mar 9 '13 at 17:31
2  
@Justin: If you have two effective zero-cycles, $e:\text{Spec}(E)\to X$ and $f:\text{Spec}(F)\to X$, with $E/k$, resp. $F/k$, a finite field extension of degree $d+1$, resp. $d$, then the norm functors $e_*(\mc{L}):= \text{Nm}_{E/k}e^*\mc{L}$ and $f_*(\mc{L}):= \text{Nm}_{F/k}f^*\mc{L}$ combine to give a retraction via $\mc{L} \mapsto e_*(\mc{L})\otimes f_*(\mc{L})^\vee$. –  Jason Starr Mar 9 '13 at 17:49
    
@Jason: Thanks! I hope you see this, it's been a week but I just got a chance to think about this again. I don't actually know this "norm functor," and I can't find anything by Googling or looking at my usual sources. Do you have a reference for this? Also, the TeX in your comment is broken: what is \mc supposed to be? –  Justin Campbell Mar 16 '13 at 17:11
1  
Never mind, I figured it out. If we think of the Brauer group as an $H^2$ then the map is corestriction. –  Justin Campbell Mar 18 '13 at 16:53
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.