MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to get my head around integrability in twistor theory, but am struggling with interpreting the concept of self-duality on complexified spaces.

One can complexify Minkowski space to $\mathbb{C}^4$ with coordinates $(z_1,z_2,z_3,z_4)$ and metric $ds^2=2(dz^2dz^4-dz^1dz^3)$. I have see it written that the two-forms

$$dz^1\wedge dz^2, \ dz^1\wedge dz^3-dz^2\wedge dz^4,\ dz^3\wedge dz^4$$

form a basis for the self-dual two-forms on $\mathbb{C}^4$. I can see that this agrees with the definition of self-duality in the standard Euclidean slice.

But what does it mean in general for these complex forms to be self-dual? Just applying the definition of the Hodge star to these forms blindly doesn't suggest that they are self-dual at all! Is there some other notion of self-dual in complexified spaces, or does the statement simply mean that they reduce to self-dual forms in some real slice?

share|cite|improve this question
My best guess is that the source you are quoting writes $\mathbb{C}^4$ for $\mathbb{R}^4\otimes_\mathbb{R} \mathbb{C}$? And $*$ is meant to be the complex linear extension of the Hodge operator on $\mathbb{R}^4$. Can you include the source? – Willie Wong Mar 8 '13 at 13:20
Dunajski - Solitons, Instantons and Twistors is the source. So should I interpret $*(x+iy)$ as $*x + i*y$ then? – Edward Hughes Mar 9 '13 at 9:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.