Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The subject says it all. I would like to know if Proposition 3.1 in Arthur-Clozel's book on the trace formula holds for local fields of positive characteristic.

Thanks!

EDIT: Here is Prop 3.1 of Arthur-Clozel: (Notation will be explained after the statement)

Proposition 3.1

Assume $\phi\in C_c^\infty(GL_n(E))$. Then there exists $f\in C_c^\infty(GL_n(F))$ such that, for regular $\gamma\in GL_n(F)$, $O_\gamma(f) = 0$ if $\gamma$ is not a norm and $O_\gamma(f) = TO_{\sigma\delta}(\phi)$ if $\gamma = N\delta$.

Notation

  • $E/F$ is an finite unramified extension of local fields (hence cyclic) of degree $r$. Let $\sigma\in Gal(E/F)$ be a generator.

  • Then there is a norm map $N : \sigma\text{-conjugacy classes in } G(E)\to \text{conjugacy classes in } G(F)$, where we say that $\delta, \delta'\in G(E)$ are $\sigma$-conjugate if there is $h\in G(E)$ such that $\delta' = h^{-1}\delta\sigma(h)$. The map $N$ is defined by sending the class of $\delta$ to the class of $\delta\sigma(\delta)\cdots\sigma^{r-1}\delta$.

  • $O_\gamma(f)$ is an orbital integral: $O_\gamma(f) = \int_{GL_n(F)_\gamma\backslash GL_n(F)}f(g^{-1}\gamma g)\ dg$, where $GL_n(F)_\gamma\subset GL_n(F)$ is the centralizer of $\gamma$.

  • $TO_{\delta\sigma}(\phi)$ is the twisted orbital integral: $TO_{\delta\sigma}(\phi) = \int_{GL_n(E)_{\delta\sigma}\backslash GL_n(E)}\phi(h^{-1}\delta \sigma(h))\ dh$. Here $GL_n(E)_{\delta\sigma}\subset GL_n(E)$ is the twisted centralizer of $\delta$: $GL_n(E)_{\delta\sigma} = \{h\in GL_n(E) : h^{-1}\delta\sigma(h) = \delta\}$.

share|improve this question
6  
The subject doesn't say it all. In particular, it doesn't say what Prop. 3.1 in Arthur-Clozel's book is ... –  Jeremy Rickard Mar 5 '13 at 23:36
4  
mathoverflow.net/howtoask, if you please... –  David Roberts Mar 5 '13 at 23:42
    
+1 for following up on the request of expanding the question. –  quid Mar 6 '13 at 12:31
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

This can be found in Laumon Cohomology of Drinfeld modules fourth chapter.

share|improve this answer
1  
volume 1....... –  plusepsilon.de Mar 6 '13 at 8:43
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.