MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A few days ago I was asked by the director of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Scholarship at Georgia Regents University (formerly known as MCG and Augusta State) to contribute an article for the new Faculty Handbook: Mentoring Undergraduates in Research and Scholarship which is to be written along the lines of the University of Alaska Anchorage Handook. In my short time at Georgia Regents University I was indeed one of the first mathematicians who engaged in "Undergraduate Research" in part due to the nature of my subject Dynamical Systems and easiness with which one can do some very law quality numerical experiments. However, I think that I am far a way from the point that I can give any meaningful advise to anybody else. I hastily authored this short document more or less written for myself while applying to UN Lincoln IMMERSE program which fully exposes my lack of competence to contribute above article. To make matters worse despite 30 contributing articles to the University of Alaska Anchorage Faculty Handbook not a single one was written by a mathematician. What bit of advice or particular detail would you include if you had to write it? I don't know if I can acknowledge you properly in the handbook, but I'll refer to this question somehow.

share|cite|improve this question
You have made your agenda clear. However, I would ask the question differently as to be more suitable for MathOverflow. I suggest something like "What bit of advice or particular detail would you include if you had to write it? I don't know if I can acknowledge you properly in the handbook, but I'll refer to this question somehow.". Gerhard "Likes Punctuation Outside Quotation Marks" Paseman, 2013.03.03 – Gerhard Paseman Mar 4 '13 at 3:22
@Gerhard Paseman I edited the question per your advise. I am a bit surprised that it looks like it is going to get closed. I could not be the only guy on this portal who is forced to think about "undergraduate research". – Predrag Punosevac Mar 4 '13 at 3:57
Looking at the examples you linked to, I think you could whip up a draft and circulate it to members of your department, and ask for help there. If you are worried about "less than perfect" English, you could email me an ascii draft and I could offer twenty minutes of review and polish (at no charge). Based on your essays, my initial concern is that your draft would have a political tinge; avoid that, and you will have a good start on your article. Will Jagy has my address if you can't determine it otherwise. Gerhard "Has Hangman On User Page" Paseman, 2013.03.03 – Gerhard Paseman Mar 4 '13 at 4:10
Regarding the votes to close and in general. This site is for questios on (research level) mathematics. Everything else can be considered as not really on-topic. Some other things are still considered somewhat within the scope of the site. However, there should typically be something that makes the question specific to mathematics. If I understand correctly the text you write is not specifically for mathematics but general advice. This is thus not specific to mathematics. You could ask this question on which is for general questions of people in... – user9072 Mar 4 '13 at 14:30
This would be a better fit for academia.SE. – Ben Crowell Mar 4 '13 at 16:11
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I'd recommend asking for input from professors who have a track record of supervising successful undergraduate research, such as Joseph Gallian or the people who run the Ross Program.

Frank Morgan also has some good advice for planning the nitty-gritty details of an REU program.

One general comment that I have, which is somewhat specific to mathematics, is that it is important for the advisor not to underestimate the potential for original undergraduate research. In your article, you wrote, "Only in a very rare circumstances exceptionally talented undergraduate students guided by some of the world's best research mathematicians can produce a genuine results." However, Gallian would be the first to admit that he is not a top research mathematician, yet his program has produced some of the world's best undergraduate mathematics research. And even Gallian admits that he has sometimes underestimated the students in his program. In my experience, professors are far more likely to create failure by expecting failure than they are to give students an exaggerated view of their own abilities. Mathematics research is difficult, but there's no reason to make it even more difficult by creating an atmosphere where failure is the expected norm.

See also this MO question.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Timoty Chow This is exactly the kind of the answer I was hopping to get by posting the question on mathoverflow. Thank you so much for taking the time to read that garbage I wrote and point me in the right direction. – Predrag Punosevac Mar 6 '13 at 17:08

I can offer some general common sense that might apply; it is derived from life experience and not from the specific setting of my mentoring undergraduates or being mentored as an undergraduate.

I find that practice is one way to develop ability in a particular skill set. I note that many of the more respected answers on this forum are not just those that are clear examples of communication: they have specific references and show quality of research and scholarship. Precision and clarity are important, but providing the links to the existing and relevant literature so that others can follow, repeat, and confirm or correct the argument presented is a hallmark of decent research; high school is not too early to start practicing such skills, even for those not destined to a profession in the sciences, engineering, or education. Even documenting and keeping journals on small projects is good practice for those aiming to produce good research. Mentors should do what they can to encourage such practice.

Gerhard "Aiming To Produce Good Research" Paseman, 2013.03.03

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.