5

1

While reading the introduction to this paper by Curtis McMullen, I came to the following (bold added):

In this paper we show that every bifurcation set contains a copy of the boundary of the Mandelbrot set or its degree $d$ generalization. The Mandelbrot sets $M_d$ are thus universal; they are initial objects in the category of bifurcations, providing a lower bound on the complexity of $B(f)$ for all families $f_t$.

(Here $f_t$ is a family of rational functions mapping $P^1$ to itself and depending holomorphically on a parameter $t$ ranging over some complex manifold, and the bifurcation set (or locus) $B(f)$ is the set of $t$ at which the dynamics of $f_t$ undergo a discontinuous change. For a positive integer $d\geq 2$, $M_d$ is the set of $t$ for which the function $z\mapsto z^d+t$ has a connected Julia set, and $\partial M_d$, the boundary of $M_d$, is the bifurcation locus for the family $\{z\mapsto z^d+t\}_t$.)

Even without knowing exactly what the "category of bifurcations" is, I can see an analogy between the claim about Mandelbrot sets and the concept of initial objects, but presumably something more definite is intended. My question is thus how to interpret the second sentence quoted from McMullen's paper, or more simply: what is the "category of bifurcations"?

flag
There's something fishy here with the "or": are there supposed to be a family of nonisomorphic initial objects? – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 19 2010 at 3:39
On the face of it, that seems to be what it's saying, but that would be impossible. I'm hoping the proper definition of the category will clear that up. – Darsh Ranjan Jan 19 2010 at 4:38
2 
It might be that rather than a single initial object, there is a "multi-initial-object": ncatlab.org/nlab/show/multilimit . For example, the category of fields has a multi-initial-object, namely the family of all prime fields. – Mike Shulman Jan 19 2010 at 6:19
I just thought of that example after I posted that comment, but I wasn't sure if it had a name. Thanks! – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 19 2010 at 14:27
of course, I ought to read the thing ( :P ) but even multilimit sounds wrong --- these things are just too flexible! I'd be inclined to believe that they're saying pieces of the M-sets are good domains for probing bifurcations, dual to how Menger sets are good codomains for maps from fractals; more than that sounds like too much. – some guy on the street Jan 24 2010 at 20:54
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.