Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There is a standard notation $\mathrm{ZF}[n]$ for Zermelo Fraenkel set theory with the power set axiom restricted to saying the set of natural numbers has $n$ successive power sets $\beth_0\dots\beth_n$.

Is there a similarly standard notation for the extension of $\mathrm{ZF}[n]$ by an axiom saying every set has an hereditary embedding in $\beth_n$?

share|improve this question
I had not known that ZF[$n$] is standard notation for this theory. In fact, if someone had used this notation without any explanation, my first guess would be that it means ZF with replacement limited to $\Sigma_n$ formulas. –  Andreas Blass Feb 23 '13 at 14:07
I suspect the notation $\mathrm{ZF}[n]$ comes from Harvey Friedman, in the context of saying that theory has the strength of order n+2 arithmetic. That is where I got it. I have seen it, likely on FOM, but I can't search it by Google since Google refuses to believe I want the square brackets! It gives me pages where virtually every variant possible of ZF by dropping some axiom has been named with a 0 somehow. –  Colin McLarty Feb 23 '13 at 14:35
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

In modern set theory $H(\kappa)$ denotes the collection of sets $X$ such that $X$ is hereditarily of cardinality strictly less than $\kappa$.

So, the statement you are asking for can be conveniently expressed as $V=H(\kappa)$, where $\kappa=\beth_{n}^+$.

share|improve this answer
That could work as a notation. But it seems odd to invoke cardinal successor in a context where we do not have choice, and especially to invoke the cardinal successor of a set, $\beth_n$, which the theory proves cannot have one. –  Colin McLarty Feb 23 '13 at 12:57
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.