MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here is a result whose proof uses Fourier-Mukai duality:

Consider a family of abelian varieties $A \rightarrow X$, its dual $\check{A} \rightarrow X$, and a torsor $\mathcal{T}$ (for $A \rightarrow X$) and a gerbe $\mathcal{G}$ on $\mathcal{T}$.

Then there exists a "dual torsor" $\check{\mathcal{T}} \rightarrow X$ (for $\check{A} \rightarrow X$), and a "dual" gerbe $\check{\mathcal{G}}$ on $\check{\mathcal{T}}$, such that the derived categories of coherent sheaves on $\mathcal{G}$ and $\check{\mathcal{G}}$ are equivalent.

My question is how to define the dual "gerbe" and its dual "torsor". My rough understanding is that the dual "torsor" $\check{\mathcal{T}}$ is defined as follows: a point in $\check{\mathcal{T}}$ corresponds to a splitting of the restriction of the gerbe $\mathcal{G}$ to a fiber of $\mathcal{T} \rightarrow X$. I'm not sure about how to construct the dual "gerbe".

share|cite|improve this question
This is the topic of the paper of Donagi and Pantev (with appendix by Arinkin). There's also a chart I love in notes of a talk of Arinkin on Fourier-Mukai transform here --- it summarizes compactly the various deformations of the Fourier-Mukai transform on an abelian variety, very handy to have around. – David Ben-Zvi Feb 20 '13 at 1:10
There are also several papers of Oren Ben-Bassat on the subject. – Sasha Feb 20 '13 at 5:45
See also work (in the smooth setting) on T-duality, e.g. work by Bouwknegt, Mathai and collaborators, and Bunke and Schick. – David Roberts Feb 20 '13 at 7:00
Thanks David! I'll have another look at that paper of Donagi & Pantev. – Vinoth Feb 22 '13 at 15:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.