3
$\begingroup$

Given two automorphic representations $\pi_1, \pi_2$ of $GL_2(\mathbb A_Q)$ and $GL_3(\mathbb A_Q)$ respectively. Let $\pi_i =\otimes_v \pi_{i, v}$.

Now, for each $v$, let $\pi_{1, v}\boxtimes \pi_{2, v}$ and $\pi_{1, v}\boxplus \pi_{2, v}$ be the admissible representation of $GL_6(Q_v)$, which, via local Langlands, corresponds tensor product and direct sum of the Weil-Deligne representations.

My question is, are there explicit construction of the $\boxtimes$ and $\boxplus$ operators?

In fact, is there any basic introduction to these operators? I see them quite a lot, but have not found any explanatory definitions...

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean here? The exterior tensor product $\boxtimes$ is a priori a rep of $GL(2) \times GL(3)$. It is rather trivial, that it will remain automorphic. What is $\boxplus$? $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Feb 11, 2013 at 13:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ boxtimes. You may like to see the paper by Langlands "einmaerchen" paper in Corvallis where these operations were discussed for the first time. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2013 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry; the sentence got mangled. I meant the paper titled "...., Einmarchen" by Langlands, in the Corvallis volume on automorphic forms, Shimura Varieties, L functions". This introduces the operations which you have mentioned. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2013 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ Here is the link to the "Ein Maerchen" paper: sunsite.ubc.ca/DigitalMathArchive/Langlands/pdf/autoreps-ps.pdf $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2013 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Aakumadula: okay, thx for the explanation. $\boxtimes$ is not the exterior tensor. $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Feb 14, 2013 at 8:57

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.