MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $M$ and $N$ be closed manifolds. Is it true that $C^{k}(N,M)$, which is the space of functions $f: N\to M$ such that $f\in C^{k}$, is a $C^{\infty}$ Banach manifold? If so, can you help me to write charts?

share|cite|improve this question

Yes, $C^k(M,N)$ is a smooth Banach manifold, when $M$ and $N$ are smooth closed manifolds.

In fact, you can consider manifolds of maps with more general domains and regularities, this lies in the foundations of "Global Analysis". The classic work in the area is mostly due to Eells, Palais, Eliasson and others. I also particularly like this nice short note by Tausk, that considers Banach manifolds of maps from sets to manifolds, with minimum regularity requirements.

In the previous links you can find explicit descriptions of how charts are constructed; but, very roughly (in the following, I am omitting all regularities for the sake of simplicity), you can regard a neighborhood of a map $f\colon M\to N$ as consisting of maps $g\colon M\to N$ that can be written as $g(p)=\exp_{f(p)} X(p)$, where $X\colon M\to TN$ is a vector field along $f$, and the exponential map is regarded w.r.t. some choice of background metric $h$ on $N$. Of course $X$ has to be small enough, e.g., its norm (that depends of what regularity we're talking about) has to be less than the injectivity radius of $h$ along $f(M)$. The correspondence given by such chart is then $g\leftrightarrow X$, which tells you that the tangent space at $f$ to $Maps(M,N)$ consists of vector fields along $f$ (of the same regularity as the maps considered). Details can be found in any of the links above, but I hope this brief description at least gives you some intuition...

Edit: Another good reference that I forgot to mention is this book by Hirsch, see Chap 2.

share|cite|improve this answer
Do all these approaches use the exponential map on the target manifold, to build the charts for the space of maps? – Pietro Majer Feb 7 '13 at 21:22
@Pietro: Although most classic constructions do require an auxiliary Riemannian metric at some point, as far as I remember they don't use the exponential map. For example, the way Hirsch does it in his book works like that. Another way of looking at spaces of functions $f\colon M\to N$ is as sections of the trivial bundle $M\times N$ over $M$, using Palais' VBNs (vector bundle neighborhoods), also without exponential maps. I learnt the faster construction above from Gerard Misiolek, during some seminars he gave on diffeomorphism groups (so there maybe some limitations to this method). – Renato G. Bettiol Feb 7 '13 at 22:22
@Pietro: Tracing back, this approach with exponential maps is what Ebin & Marsden use in their Ann. of Math. paper of 1970. That's probably where the whole thing came from. – Renato G. Bettiol Feb 7 '13 at 22:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.