MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider the transform $\widehat{b}=T^{-1}b$, where $T=\begin{bmatrix}b & Ab & A^2b & \dots & A^{n-1}b \end{bmatrix}$ has full rank. Is it possible to find an explicit expression for \begin{equation} \widehat{b}=\begin{bmatrix} \widehat{b}_1 \\\ \vdots \\\ \widehat{b}_n \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} in terms of the coefficients for $det(I\lambda-A)=det(I\lambda-\widehat{A})=a_0+a_1\lambda+\dots+a_{n-1}\lambda^{n-1}+\lambda^n$. Further, is it possible to derive an explicit expresion for $\widehat{A}=T^{-1}AT$ in terms of these coefficients?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $T^{(i)}=A^{i-1}b$ for $i=1,\cdots n$. You can solve $\widehat{b}$ from the equation $T\widehat{b}=b$. By Cramer's rule,

$$ \widehat{b_1}=\frac{det[b, T^{(2)}, \cdots, T^{(n)}]} {det T} $$ $$ \widehat{b_2}=\frac{det[b, b, T^{(3)}, \cdots, T^{(n)}]} {det T} $$ $\cdots$ $$ \widehat{b_n}=\frac{det[b, T^{(2)}, \cdots, T^{(n-1)},b]} {det T} $$ Then you can see that $\widehat{b_1}=1, \widehat{b_i}=0$ for all $i=2,\cdots, n$.

Further for $\widehat{A}$, use Cramer's rule to each column vector of $\widehat{A}$, in the equation $T\widehat{A} = AT$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Realized after posting solution, it is just a matter of changing the basis. – i707107 Feb 6 '13 at 2:41

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.