Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are some of the open problems in Seiberg-Witten Theory on 4-Manifolds.I tried googling but couldn't any. I tried googling it, but couldn't find any resources.The places where I can a survey or review of them would be welcome.

share|improve this question
2  
Since you are interested in Ncg, I want to make the remark that a former fellow PhD student of mine - Vadim Alekseev - has studied a non-commutative generalization of Seiberg-Witten invariants, i.e., defined in the context of spectral triples. Here is the link to his PhD thesis: webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2011/alekseev –  plusepsilon.de Feb 5 '13 at 5:29
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

One basic structural problem about the SW invariants is the question of simple type: suppose that $X$ is a simply connected 4-manifold with $b^+>1$, and $\mathfrak{s}$ a $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structure such that $SW_X(\mathfrak{s})\neq 0$. Must $\mathfrak{s}$ arise from an almost complex structure? This is true when $X$ is symplectic (Taubes in "$SW\Rightarrow Gr$") but open in general.

The 11/8-conjecture (that for a closed Spin 4-manifold $X$ of signature $\sigma$, one has $b_2(X)\geq 11|\sigma|/8$) is open. SW theory has yielded strong results in this direction (Furuta's 10/8 theorem); proving the conjecture via SW theory is very hard but might be possible.

Essentially all of the fundamental questions about the classification of smooth 4-manifolds, or about the existence and uniqueness of symplectic structures on them, are open. We do not know how much Seiberg-Witten theory sees. For instance:

Suppose $X$ is a closed 4-manifold with an almost complex structure $J$. Let $w\in H^2(X;\mathbb{R})$ be a class with $w^2>0$. Is there a symplectic form $\omega$ with compatible almost complex structure homotopic to $J$ and symplectic class $w$? The "Taubes constraints" are the following necessary conditions, which constrain the SW invariants in terms of $w$ and $c=c_1(TX,J)$ (see e.g. Donaldson's survey on the SW equations): (i) $SW(\mathfrak{s}_{can})=\pm 1$ (the sign can be made precise) where $\mathfrak{s}_{can}$ is the $\mathrm{Spin}^c$-structure arising from $J$; (ii) $-c\cdot w\geq 0$; and (iii) if $SW(\mathfrak{s})\neq 0$ then $|c_1(\mathfrak{s})\cdot [\omega]| \leq -c \cdot [\omega]$, with equality iff $\mathfrak{s}$ is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{s}_{can}$ or its conjugate. The question is: if $X$ is simply connected, are these sufficient conditions? (Example: Fintushel-Stern knot surgery on an elliptically fibered K3 surface along a knot with monic Alexander polynomial.)

share|improve this answer
    
I omitted to say that the Taubes constraints apply when $b^+>1$, and the question I mentioned at the end concerns that case. –  Tim Perutz Feb 15 '13 at 2:36
add comment

It might be useful to generalize a theorem of Donaldson and Sullivan, that the Donaldson invariants are defined for quasi-conformal 4-manifolds, to the category of Seiberg-Witten invariants. More generally, one would like to know which smooth invariants of 4-manifolds are defined for quasi-conformal 4-manifolds.

share|improve this answer
add comment

One basic problem is determining the relationship between Seiberg-Witten invariants and Donaldson invariants of $4$-manifolds. Witten himself proposed the precise relationship between the two in the original paper Monopoles and 4-Manifolds, but as far as I know the relationship has not been proven in general. Witten's conjecture has been proven in many cases, however. See the answer to this question for a good overview of the current status of this problem.

share|improve this answer
    
it's just amazing to see the witten's works.thanks for the link. –  Koushik Feb 5 '13 at 3:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.