MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This might be a little bit specific but here it goes. While reading a paper (Brauer-Manin pairing...) by Yamazaki, I encountered this definition.

Let $V$ be a variety and $y$ be a one dimensional point on $V$, i.e. $dim\overline{ \{ y \} } = 1$. Then let $C(y)$ be its closure in $V$ and $\tilde{C}(y)$ be normalization and $\bar C(y)$ be smooth completion. Let $C_\infty : = \bar C(y) - \tilde{C}(y)$. Then he defined the following group:

$UK^M_{r+1}:= ker \left[K_r^M(k(y)) \to \bigoplus_{x \in C_\infty}\left(K_{r-1}^M(k(x)) \oplus K_{r}^M(k(x))\right)\right]$.

The first component is the tame symbol at $x$ and the second component is defined as $a \to \partial_x(a \cup \pi_x)$ where $\partial_x$ is the tame symbol at $x$ and $\pi_x$ is a uniformizer at $x$.

He says that this group doesn't depend on the choice of the uniformizer, but I couldn't see why. Is there an easy way to tell that this group doesn't depend on the choice of the uniformizer?

share|cite|improve this question

It follows from a derivation-like property of the tame symbol (which can be found e.g. in Remark 4.6. of Bass-Tate "The Milnor ring of a global field"). To fix notation, let $C$ be a smooth affine curve, $\overline{C}$ the completion and $C_\infty=\overline{C}\setminus C$ the boundary divisor. For a point $x\in C_\infty$, any uniformizer is of the form $u\pi_x$ for $\pi_x$ a specific choice of uniformizer and $u\in k(C)^\times$ with $v_x(u)=0$. For a symbol $a\in K^M_r(k(C))$ and $u\pi_x\in k(C)^\times$ we get $$ \partial_x(a\cup u\pi_x)=\lambda(a)\partial_x(u\pi_x)-\partial_x(a)\rho(u\pi_x)\in K^M_r(k(x)). $$ The map $\lambda:K^M_r(k(C))\to K^M_r(k(x))$ is induced from $k(C)^\times\to k(x)^\times:u\pi^n\mapsto u$, and $\rho$ is induced from mapping $k(C)^\times\to k(x)^\times:u\pi^n\mapsto (-1)^nu$.

An element $a\in UK^M_{r+1}$ will have $\partial_x(a)=0$, so the second term of $\partial_x(a\cup u\pi_x)$ is $0$ independent of the choice of uniformizer. In the first term, $\partial_x(u\pi_x)=1\in K_0(k(x))$ independently of the generator. We get that $\partial_x(a\cup u\pi_x)=\lambda(a)$ only depends on $a$, and hence is independent of the choice of uniformizer whenever $\partial_x(a)=0$. (This, however, requires to use both the tame symbol and the second map, the second map as well as its kernel may still depend on the choice.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.