Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Patrick D. Baier in his Ph.D. thesis for proving the theorem 2.1.4 used the following non-trivial fact (in chapter 2 on page 14):

Let $0\neq X\in V$ (here $V$ is of dimension 6), $W^\ast = Ann(X)$ and $\Omega\in\wedge^3 V^\ast$. Then we can find unique elements $\psi\in\wedge^2 V^\ast$ and $\phi\in\wedge^3 V^\ast$ such that $\Omega=\theta\wedge\psi + \phi$ (I think this decomposition is from Hitchin in his paper about geometry of three forms in six dimensions) so that $i_X\Omega=\psi$ (why?). Moreover, there are unique elements $r\in\mathbb{R}$ and $Y\in Ker(\theta)$ (here $\theta\in V^\ast$ with $\theta (X)=1$) such that (why?) we have

1) $i_{(rX)} v = \psi\wedge\phi$

2) $i_Y v_0 = \psi\wedge\psi$

(here $v_0\in\wedge^5 W^\ast$ is the unique element such that $v=\theta\wedge v_0$)

share|improve this question
1  
From the thesis, I see that one is supposed to make some choices of $v \in \Lambda^6 V^*$ and $\theta \in V^*$. $i_X v$ and $\psi \wedge \phi$ are both in $\ker\; i_X \cong \Lambda^5 W^* \subset \Lambda^5 V^*$, so must be proportional. $\ker \theta \to \Lambda^4 W^*, \; Y \mapsto i_Y v_0$ is an isomorphism. –  Johannes Nordström Feb 3 '13 at 10:12
    
Dear @Johannes, why we have $keri_X≅Λ^5W^∗$ –  Hassan Jolany Feb 3 '13 at 14:12
1  
The wording of the non-trivial fact appears somewhat garbled to me. Any chance you could edit it to make its statement clearer? –  Deane Yang Nov 10 '13 at 17:42
    
For example, what's $\nu$? –  Deane Yang Nov 10 '13 at 18:34
    
And where in the statement is $W^*$ used? –  Deane Yang Nov 10 '13 at 18:41

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I have no idea what the second half of the statement is, but here's what I think the first half says:

If $X \in V$ and $\theta \in V^*$ such that $\langle \theta, X\rangle \ne 0$, then given any nonzero $\Omega \in \Lambda^3V^*$, there exists unique elements $\psi \in \Lambda^2V^*$ and $\phi \in \Lambda^3V^*$ such that the following hold:

  • $\Omega = \theta\wedge\psi + \phi$
  • $i(X)\Omega = \psi$

To prove this, simply extend $\theta$ to a basis of $V^*$, $\theta_1, \dots, \theta_n$, where $\theta_1 = \theta$ and $\theta_2, \dots, \theta_n$ comprise a basis of $X^\perp$ and expand $\psi$ and $\phi$ with respect to the bases induced on $\Lambda^2V^*$ and $\Lambda^3V^*$.

share|improve this answer

Dear @Hassan, about the first question: why $\iota_X \Omega=\psi$ please note that $\psi\in\Lambda^2 W^* $ and $\phi\in\Lambda^3 W^* $. So the identity comes from $\theta(X)=1$. About the second question me too I'd like to know why.

Cheers

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.