MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've come across an annoying lemma trying to finish up an argument, and I was hoping one of you guys knew about it.

Question: Given

  1. a weight $\lambda$ of a simple Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$, and
  2. integers $n_\alpha$ for each simple root $\alpha$,

Is there a highest weight $\nu$, such that in the crystal of with highest weight $\nu$ there is an element $x$ of weight $\lambda$ such that $\tilde{F}_\alpha^{n_\alpha}x\neq 0$?

This is true in $\mathfrak{sl}_2$, which makes me hopeful about other Lie algebras, but the argument isn't coming together for me.

share|cite|improve this question

OK, I think I see the answer: by whatever character formula you like, you can see that for any fixed weight spaces (say, the $\lambda$ and $\lambda-n_\alpha\alpha$ for all $\alpha$), you can choose $\nu$ so that the multiplicities at all these points are very large compared to the differences between the those multiplicities. Since the number of elements in the crystal killed by $\tilde{F}_{\alpha}^{n_\alpha}$ is just the difference in the weight multiplicities (or 0), the result follows by pigeonhole.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.