Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can someone identify the knot whose complement in $\mathbb{S}^{3}$ will produce the Hantzsche-Wendt manifold?

Thanks

share|improve this question
2  
As far as I know, the HW manifold is closed (it is the flat 3-manifold that Seifert-fibers over the projective plane). –  Bruno Martelli Jan 26 '13 at 6:56
    
What is the definition of this manifold? There's not much that's googlable. –  Ryan Budney Jan 26 '13 at 7:47
    
The HW manifold is the orbit space $\mathbb{R}^{3} / <x , y , z |xy^{2}x^{-1}y^{2} = y x^{2} y^{-1} x^{2} = 1 , z = xy > $ where $X = diag[1 , -1 , 1] , Y = diag[-1, 1 , -1 ] $ and $Z = diag[-1,-1,1]$ and $x = (\frac{1}{2} e_{1} , X), y = ( \frac{1}{2} (e_{2} - e_{3} ) , Y ) $ and $z=(\frac{1}{2}(e_{1} - e_{2} + e_{3} ) , Z)$, this group is a subgroup of the group of affine motions of $3$-space. –  jf9rj4o Jan 26 '13 at 13:04
    
@jf9: Does "produce" mean Dehn suegery? Otherwise, Bruno answered your question. –  Misha Jan 26 '13 at 18:43

2 Answers 2

Much enlightenment (though not an explicit answer to the question) can be gleaned from Bruno Zimmermann's paper "On the Hantzsche-Wendt manifold".

share|improve this answer

Supposing the question is, "Can the Hantsche-Wendt manifold be realized as a cyclic branched cover of a knot in the 3-sphere", then the answer is yes: it is a 3-fold cyclic branched cover along the figure-eight knot. Incidentally, it is also a 2-fold branched cover along the Borromean rings.

On the other hand, if the question is, "Can the Hantsche-Wendt manifold $M$ be realized by performing Dehn surgery along a knot in the 3-sphere" (as Misha seems to suggest), then the answer is no, since $H_1(M,\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}_2 \oplus \mathbb{Z}_2$ is not a cyclic group.

share|improve this answer
    
As shown in the reference I gave. –  Igor Rivin Jan 27 '13 at 2:08
1  
Sorry, I saw your post after I finished writing my answer. And yes, that's the right reference. –  Alex Suciu Jan 27 '13 at 2:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.