Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hi,

I've been looking at situations where Jensen's inequality is almost tight, and found myself proving a lemma that I'm nearly certain exists somewhere in the literature.

The specifics are as follows:

Suppose we have some convex, increasing function $f(x)$ and a set of $n$ real numbers $x_i$. Define $$ \delta := \frac{\sum f(x_i)}{ n } -f\left(\frac{\sum x_i}{n}\right)$$ We know that $\delta$ is positive by Jensen's, and that it is zero when all the $x_i$'s are equal to the average. Let $\delta$ be positive, but small. We now fix an epsilon, and ask how many $x_i$'s are either greater than $\frac{\sum x_i}{n}(1 + \epsilon)$ or smaller than $\frac{\sum x_i}{n}(1 - \epsilon)$. If we call that set $I$, the lemma would state that $$ |I| \leq g(\delta, \epsilon) n$$ for $g$ continuous, vanishing as delta goes to zero for any fixed $\epsilon$, and depending only on the choice of $f$. What this shows is that if the Jensen's "deficit" is small, then the number of entries that are "far away" from the average is $o(n)$.

Is this some well known (or even not well known, but existent...) lemma?

Thanks!

-Matan

EDIT: Made a silly mistake in defining $\delta$ - the body should now contain the correct normalization (Thanks Daniel!)

share|improve this question
2  
You could try to look for things pertaining to strict convexity, which has applications in the Calculus of Variations. A useful inequality to this end is $f(\theta x+(1−\theta)y)+c|x-y|^2 \leq \theta f(x) +(1-\theta)f(y)$. From this perspective it makes more sense to look at $\delta$ as the difference of the average of the values and the value of the average. – Daniel Spector 0 secs ago –  Daniel Spector Jan 25 '13 at 15:39
    
There appears to be some literature on defect versions of Jensen's inequality, e.g. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2027471 or ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2274968 –  Terry Tao Jan 25 '13 at 19:22
    
Daniel, could you plz let me know where that inequality come from? any reference? –  SAmath Jan 25 at 18:18

1 Answer 1

This is not an answer but it may be helpful to know that there exists the notion of modulus of convexity of a convex function $f:X\to ]-\infty,\infty]$ defined on a Banach space $X$ which quantifies how convex a convex function is. It is defined as $$ \delta_f(t) = \inf\{\tfrac{1}{2}f(x) + \tfrac12 f(y) - f(\tfrac{x+y}{2})\ :\ \|x-y\|=t \}. $$ If $\delta_f(t)>0$ for $t>0$ then $f$ is uniformly convex, if $\delta_f(t)>Ct^p$ for some $C>0$, then $f$ one says that $f$ has a modulus of convexity of power type $p$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.