Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I posted this question on Math.SE (link), but it didn't get any answers so I'm going to ask here. This is an edited version of the question.


Let $p$ be a prime and $n \geq 1$ some integer. Furthermore, let $G$ be a finite group where $p$-Sylow subgroups have order $p^n$. Denote by $n_p(G)$ the number of Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$. Denote the number of elements in the union of all Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ by $f_p(G)$. I am interested in finding lower bounds for $f_p(G)$ that do not depend on the group $G$, but only on $p$, $n$ and $n_p(G)$.

By Sylow's theorem, we know that $n_p(G) = kp + 1$ for some integer $k \geq 0$. What I know so far:

  • If $k = 0$, then $f_p(G) = p^n$.
  • If $k = 1$, then $f_p(G) = p^{n+1}$.
  • If $k \geq 2$, then $f_p(G) \geq 2p^{n+1} - p^n$.

This is a theorem due to G. A. Miller, see also this question from Math.SE. To prove the inequality in the case $k \geq 2$, you first prove that then $f_p(G) > p^{n+1}$. Then observe that $f_p(G) - 1$ is divisible by $p-1$, then the inequality follows from Frobenius theorem (*). Details are in a book of Miller, Blichfeldt and Dickson (Theory and Applications of Finite Groups) and a paper of Miller ("Some deductions from Frobenius Theorem").

My main question is the following:

What is a better lower bound for the case $k > 2$?

The case $n = 1$ is easy, because then we know the value of $f_p(G)$ precisely. If $n = 1$, then $f_p(G) = n_p(G)(p-1)+1$. What about when $n > 1$? Answers regarding particular $n$ or particular $k$ are also welcome.

If the Sylow $p$-subgroups are cyclic, then we have $f_p(G) \geq n_p(G)\varphi(p^n) + p^{n-1}$ and this bound is okay. But most $p$-groups are not cyclic..

I think the following example shows that $f_p(G)$ gets arbitrarily large values for fixed $p$ and $n$ (not surprising). By Dirichlet's theorem, there exist arbitrarily large primes $q$ such that $q \equiv 1 \mod{p}$. Then in a direct product $G = C_{p^{n-1}} \times H$, where $H$ is a non-abelian group of order $pq$, the Sylow subgroups of $G$ have $C_{p^{n-1}}$ as their common intersection. There are exactly $q$ Sylow $p$-subgroups, because otherwise $G$ would be nilpotent but its subgroup $H$ is not. Therefore the number of elements in the $p$-Sylow subgroups is $f_p(G) = q(p^{n} - p^{n-1}) + p^{n-1}$, and this goes to infinity as $q$ goes to infinity. Thus there exist groups $G$ with Sylow $p$-subgroups of order $p^n$ such that $f_p(G)$ is arbitrarily large.

Also, $f_p(G) \rightarrow \infty$ as $k \rightarrow \infty$. This is seen by noticing that $f_p(G)^{p^n} \geq n_p(G)$, so

$$f_p(G) \geq (kp + 1)^{p^{-n}}$$

which goes to infinity as $k \rightarrow \infty$.

One more observation: not all integers $\equiv 1 \mod{p}$ are possible amounts of Sylow $p$-subgroups. For example, there does not exist a group with exactly $22$ Sylow $3$-subgroups, although $22 \equiv 1 \mod{3}$. I don't know if this complicates things.

(*) Frobenius Theorem says that when $G$ is a finite group with order divisible by $s$, the number of solutions to $x^s = 1$ in $G$ is a multiple of $s$. We know that $f_p(G)$ is the number of solutions to $x^{p^n} = 1$ in $G$.

share|improve this question
    
Nice question. You say you want a formula for $f_p(G)$ depending only on $n_p(G)$ but you seem to be happy to have $p$ and $n$ in the formula as well, right? (Well, there'd be no hope if not, so I hope this is OK!) Perhaps you should adjust the question to make this clear. –  Nick Gill Jan 21 '13 at 10:49
    
@Nick Gill: Yes, the lower bound will of course depend on $p$ and $n$, just like the lower bound given by Miller's thm does. Basically given $p$ and $n$, we're looking at functions $g$ such that $f_p(G) \geq g(k)$ for any finite group $G$ with Sylow subgroups of order $p^n$ and $n_p(G) = kp + 1$. Is this what you meant? –  Mikko Korhonen Jan 21 '13 at 12:33
    
Perhaps one way to start with this is that given $n$, $p$ and $k$, find the smallest possible value for $f_p(G)$. I don't know if the bound $2p^{n+1}−p^n$ is sharp for the case $k=2$. It is sharp for all primes $p$ such that $2p+1$ is prime, which can be seen by the construction in my question. –  Mikko Korhonen Jan 21 '13 at 13:21
    
@Mikko, no that's not what I meant. I'm suggesting that you replace "a formula for $f_p(G)$ depending only on $n_p(G)$" by "a formula for $f_p(G)$ depending only on $p$, $n$ and $n_p(G)$". –  Nick Gill Jan 23 '13 at 9:43
1  
@Nick: Ok, I'll edit the post. What I mean by the construction is this. Fix a prime $p$ and integer $n \geq 1$. The construction shows that we can find a group $G$ with Sylow $p$-subgroups of order $p^n$ (not just some arbitrary power of $p$ like in your comment) such that $f_p(G)$ is arbitrarily large. –  Mikko Korhonen Jan 23 '13 at 11:02

1 Answer 1

This is just a small partial result and some comments. I think the following should settle the case $k = 2$.

Suppose that $G$ is a group with Sylow $p$-subgroups of order $p^n$ and that $n_p(G) = 2p + 1$. According to a theorem of Marshall Hall (see theorem 3.1 in [*]), this can only happen if $2p + 1 = q^t$ is a power of a prime, so let's assume that this is the case.

First of all, the lower bound $p^n(2p - 1)$ given in the question is attained. Let

$$G = C_{p^{n-1}} \times AGL(1, q^t),$$

where $AGL(1, q^t)$ is the group of invertible affine transformations $x \mapsto ax + b$ of the field of order $q^t$. Here $G$ has exactly $2p + 1$ Sylow $p$-subgroups, the Sylow $p$-subgroups have order $p^n$ and $f_p(G) = p^n(2p - 1)$.

Now by Frobenius theorem $f_p(G) = tp^n$ where $t$ is an integer. Since $2p - 1 \leq t < 2p + 1$, we see that $t = 2p - 1$ or $t = 2p$.

If $p \neq 2$, then $t = 2p - 1$ because $t-1$ must be a multiple of $p - 1$ [**]. Therefore in this case $f_p(G) = p^n(2p - 1)$.

If $p = 2$ and $n \geq 2$, then $f_2(G) = 2^{n+2}$ is attained by a semidirect product $G = C_{2^n} \ltimes_\theta C_5$ (I think, I'll check this later).


I have not made much progress for the cases where $n_p(G) = kp + 1$ and $k > 2$. In the case where $n_p(G) = 3p + 1$, a theorem of Marshall Hall (see theorem 3.2 in [*]) shows that $p = 2$, $p = 3$ or $p = 5$. It seems that things get messy from now on with this approach, perhaps it's best to disregard "impossible values" like $n_3(G) = 22$. Or we could start with the case $p = 2$ where there are no impossible values.

[*] M. Hall, On the number of Sylow subgroups in a finite group (1967) DOI link

[**] Proof: Now $f_p(G) - 1$ is the number of elements of order $p^k$, where $1 \leq k \leq n$. Since the number of elements of order $s$ is always a multiple of $\varphi(s)$, we get that $f_p(G) - 1$ must be a multiple of $p-1$. Thus $t-1$ is also a multiple of $p-1$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.