MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is well-known that a fiber bundle under some mild hypothesis is a fibration, but I don't know any examples of fiber bundles which aren't (Hurewicz) fibrations (they should be weird examples, I think, because if the base space is paracompact then the bundle is a fibration).

Does anybody know an example?


share|cite|improve this question
It will still be a Serre fibration, in any case. – David Roberts Jan 17 '13 at 14:09
Here's a vague sketch. Take a non-numerable cover of some necessarily non paracompact space, and take a non coboundary, G-valued Čech cocycle. Then this bundle isn't classifiable by a map to BG, as the universal bundle trivialities over a numerable cover (i.e. is numerable), and numerable covers pull back. As soon as your bundle is numerable it is a Hurewicz fibration. Now you have a chance that you'll find an example. – David Roberts Jan 17 '13 at 14:17
up vote 19 down vote accepted

$\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\To}{\longrightarrow} \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$The example described in Tom Goodwillie's answer to a related mathoverflow question essentially solves this question. Specifically, Tom defines an orientable, non-trivial, real line bundle $L$ over a contractible space $X$. The principal $GL_1^+(\RR)$-bundle — $GL_1(\RR)$ will work as well — associated to $L$ is then a locally trivial fibre bundle $p:E\to X$. The principal bundle $p:E\to X$ does not admit a section, since the line bundle $L$ is not trivial. It follows that $p$ cannot be a Hurewicz fibration: otherwise it would admit a section, given that $X$ is contractible. For convenience, I will give below the construction of $p:E\to X$ and a few details of the proof — mostly copied from Tom's answer, and following his notation where possible. Please upvote Tom Goodwillie's answer, which is certainly shorter and more readable.

The base space $X$

Let $X$ be the space obtained by gluing two copies of $\RR$ along $\RR^+$: $$ X = (\RR\times\{0,1\})\mathbin{/}{\sim} $$ where ${\sim}$ is generated by $(x,0)\sim(x,1)$ for $x\in\RR^+$. This space is not Hausdorff, and is closely related to the well-known line with two origins. Let $q:\RR\times\{0,1\}\to X$ be the quotient map. Define two open subspaces covering $X$ by $U=q(\RR\times\{0\})$ and $V=q(\RR\times\{1\})$. Finally, let $g:X\to\RR$ be the continuous function determined by $g(q(x,i))=x$, and define $$f=g|_{U\cap V}: U\cap V \To \RR^+$$ Importantly, observe that $f$ does not extend to a continuous map $X\to\RR^+$.

The total space $E$

Consider the topological abelian group $G=GL_1^+(\RR)=(\RR^+,\cdot)$ given by the positive reals with multiplication. Let $E_U=U\times G$ and $E_V= V\times G$ denote the trivial $G$-bundles over $U$ and $V$, respectively. Construct the principal $G$-bundle $E$ over $X$ by gluing $E_U$ and $E_V$ along $U\cap V$ via the $G$-isomorphism $$ \varphi_f : E_U|_{U\cap V}\overset{\simeq}{\To} E_V|_{U\cap V} $$ defined by $$ \varphi_f(x,g)=\bigl(x,f(x)\cdot g\bigr) $$ More concretely, $E$ is obtained from $E_U \amalg E_V$ by identifying $(x,g)\in E_U$ with $\varphi_f(x,g)\in E_V$ for each $x\in U\cap V$. As in Tom Goodwillie's answer, we could just as well use any other continuous function $f:U\cap V\to\RR^+$ which does not extend to a continuous function $X\to\RR^+$.

Non-triviality of the principal bundle $E\to X$

The projection map $p:E\to X$ gives a principal $G$-bundle over $X$, which comes with canonical isomorphisms $E|_U = E_U$ and $E|_V = E_V$. We will now show $p$ does not admit a section. By the construction of $E$, a section of $p:E\to X$ determines:

  • a section of $E_U=U\times G\to U$, and therefore a map $s_U:U\to G=\RR^+$;
  • similarly, a map $s_V:V\to G=\RR^+$;
  • these maps verify $s_V(x)=f(x)\cdot s_U(x)$ for each $x\in U\cap V$.

In particular, $f(x)=s_V(x)/s_U(x)$ for all $x\in U\cap V$. However, this implies that $f$ extends to a continuous function $\overline{f}:X\to\RR^+$ given by $$ \overline{f}(x)=\frac{s_V\bigl(q(g(x),1)\bigr)}{s_U\bigl(q(g(x),0)\bigr)} $$ which contradicts the known non-extension property of $f$.


The projection $p:E\to X$ gives a locally trivial principal $G$-bundle over $X$, since $E|_U\simeq E_U$ and $E|_V\simeq E_V$ are trivial $G$-bundles. Thus, it remains to show that $p$ is not a Hurewicz fibration. Note that $X$ is contractible. So if $p:E\to X$ were a fibration, it would necessarily admit a section. In detail, let $H:X\times I\to X$ be a null-homotopy of $\id_X$. We can obviously lift the constant map $H_1$ to $E$. Assuming $p$ is a Hurewicz fibration, the homotopy lifting property then produces a lift $\widetilde{H}: X\times I\to E$ of $H$ to $E$, and consequently a section $\widetilde{H}_0$ of $p$. But we showed in the previous paragraph that $p$ admits no sections. In conclusion, $p$ is not a Hurewicz fibration.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.