MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is known that Birkhoff's pointwise ergodic theorem (unlike von Neumann's mean ergodic Theorem) fails to hold for general Folner sequences. The counter-example usually given is the Folner sequence $F_N=\{N^2,N^2+1...,N^2+N\}$, however on the references (including the first such result by Akcoglu and del Junco in 1975) the Folner sequence which fails is actually $G_N=\{N,N+1,...,N+\lfloor N\rfloor\}$. Since $\{F_N\}$ is just a (quite sparse) subsequence of $\{G_N\}$ it could happen that the ergodic averages converge pointwise along $\{F_N\}$ even if they don't along $\{G_N\}$.

Moreover, Lindenstrauss showed that every Folner sequence has a subsequence along which convergence holds.

So I'm just curious if there is a published proof (or if it is easy and I'm just overlooking something) that the sequence $\{F_N\}$ is not good for pointwise ergodic theorem.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Bellow, Alexandra(1-NW); Jones, Roger(1-DPL); Rosenblatt, Joseph(1-OHS) Convergence for moving averages. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 10 (1990), no. 1, 43–62.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! I couldn't find that paper online, but following citations I found what I was looking for in Butler, S. V.(1-IL); Rosenblatt, J. M.(1-IL) Moving averages. Colloq. Math. 113 (2008), no. 2, 251–266. – Joel Moreira Jan 15 '13 at 17:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.