Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

i´m searching for the displacement of the surface of a elastic rectangle for a given x and y and a force at a position.

like a bowling ball on a trampoline

the equation should include a var for the elasticity of the surface and the position and strength of the point-shaped force. the return should be a delta-z to any given xy-pair.

I tried a lot of sin cos stuff but could not figure it out. One of the problems is the surface should be fixed at the edges (like a trampoline). so the influence of the force is getting weaker (or the surface is getting stiffer) near the edge.

the is no need for a physically correct model. A function that gives me a roughly such a curve would help me alot

Any suggestions???

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

Your problem is one of solving Laplace's equation subject to Neumann boundary conditions. This problem is equivalent to a problem in electrostatics. For small displacements, the height of the trampoline is equivalent to the electric potential, and the bowling ball is eqivalent to a point charge. The fixed boundary of the trampoline is a conducting, grounded box. You should use the method of image charges1. Your original charge maps into a two-dimensional lattice of image charges, as reflected in the sides of the rectangle. The sign of the image charge alternates in a checkerboard pattern. To find the resulting potential, You could either sum the two-dimensional infinite series analytically, or just add up the closest charges numerically. I think the analytical solution involves an elliptic integral, which I prefer to avoid, so if I had to do this I'd do it numerically.

share|improve this answer
2  
The cartoon image of a bowling ball on a trampoline is quite far from a small-displacement linear approximation, but I suppose if the trampoline can handle several jumping humans then the bowling ball is light enough. The series you suggest converges rather slowly as it stands; the elliptic integrals aren't that bad, and at least they have more rapidly converging series expansions. –  Noam D. Elkies Jan 13 '13 at 0:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.