Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The depth of a ring or module is one of the most basic invariants in commutative ring theory.

Q1: Is there also a powerful notion of depth for non-commutative rings ?

By a search in mathscinet, I only found the papers [BT], [R]. In the latter the $I$-depth of a module is defined (in analogue to the comm. case) as the minimal $i$ such that $Ext_R^i(R/I,M)\neq 0$ ($R$ a ring, $I$ a left ideal in $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module). But there are no applications of the depth in the paper. In particular, I wonder:

Q2: Does the Auslander-Buchsbaum formula holds for this depth (for an approriate definition of the dimension of $R$) ?

According to the cited papers, there seems to be no regular sequences defined for non-comm. rings. However, as far as I can see, the usual definition that $x_1,...,x_n \in R$ are $M$-regular, if $x_i$ is regular on $M/(\sum_{j=1}^iRx_i)M$ makes sense in the non-comm. case, too.

Q3: Why doesn't this definition work well resp. dosn't have nice properties ? (I believe it doesn't have nice properties because it isn't considered in the literature).

PS: There are more results for the depth of non-comm. graded rings in the literature, but I want to restrict to the ungraded case here.


[BT] J. Bueso, B. Torrecillas: Noncommutative local cohomology. Comm. Alg. 11(1983), 681-693

[R] J. Raynaud: Profondeur, hauteur et localisations en algebre non commutative. J. of Pure Appl. Alg. 31(1984), 199-215

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.