Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(R, \mathfrak{m})$ be a commutative Noetherian local ring and $M$ a finitely generated $R$-module. Let $x_1,...,x_t$ be an $M$-regular sequence and $I = (x_1,...,x_t)$. Is it true that $$\mathrm{Tor}_1^R(R/I^n, M) = 0$$ for all $n \geq 1$?

share|improve this question
1  
It's true for $n=1$ if the sequence is also $R$-regular, since then $\mathrm{Tor}_{1}^{R}(R/I,M) \simeq \mathrm{Tor}_{1}^{R/I}(R/I,M/I)$. (see Lemma 18.2.iii in Matsumura's CRT.) –  David Hansen Jan 9 '13 at 19:11
1  
Lemma 18.2 in Matsumura need $x$ is both $R$-regular and $M$-regular. –  Pham Hung Quy Jan 10 '13 at 2:41
    
So Lemma 18.2 applies at least when $M$ has finite projective dimension. –  Mahdi Majidi-Zolbanin Jan 10 '13 at 4:22
    
$I^{n-1}/I^n$ is a free $R/I$-module, so the statement follows from a simple induction. –  Angelo Jul 25 '13 at 5:41

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I've posted a proof here for the special case when $M$ is cyclic. Furthermore, I've mentioned that the result holds for finitely generated modules when the sequence is $R$-regular and $M$-regular.

share|improve this answer
    
Very nice proof. Thanks you very much YACP. The case $M$ is cyclic is an exercise in the book about tight closure of C. Huneke. Your proof even better than its solution (in my opinion). –  Pham Hung Quy Jan 12 '13 at 15:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.