MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In classical category theory we have a following criterion. If $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ are finitely complete categories and $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ is a functor which preserves finite limits and reflects isomorphisms, then $F$ is faithful. It follows easily from an observation that an equalizer of two parallel morphisms is an isomorphism if and only if those morphisms are equal.

My question is

Given two finitely complete $(\infty, 1)$-categories $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ and a functor $F : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ which preserves finite limits and reflects equivalences, does it follow that $\mathrm{Ho} F : \mathrm{Ho} \mathcal{C} \to \mathrm{Ho} \mathcal{D}$ is faithful?

The observation I mentioned previously doesn't work in higher category theory since for example an equalizer of the identity morphism of an object $X$ with itself is a free loop object on $X$, but I am unable to decide whether this faithfulness criterion is valid.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Here's a counterexample. Let $\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{D}$ be the stable $(\infty,1)$-category of perfect complexes over $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$, and let $F(X)=X\otimes \mathbb{Z}/p$ (the derived tensor product). Then $F$ is exact, and does not send any nonzero objects to zero and hence reflects equivalences. But $F$ is not faithful, since it kills the multiplication by $p$ map on any object.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.