Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any special reason that we use the sines and cosines functions in the Fourier Series, while we know that if we chose any maximal orthonormal system in L2, we would get the same result? Is it something historical or what?

Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question
2  
The sine and cosine are quite natural from the perspective of sound and frequencies. Otherwise, I think it's more natural to take a basis of complex exponentials. –  Qiaochu Yuan Jan 14 '10 at 16:03
    
Actually by sines and cosines, I had the basis of complex exponentials in my mind. Thank you. –  Axiom Jan 14 '10 at 16:06
9  
OH. Well, in that case, the basis of complex exponentials is the one that diagonalizes the derivative. –  Qiaochu Yuan Jan 14 '10 at 16:13
6  
IMO Terry Tao's article on the Fourier Transform in the Princeton Companion to Mathematics is perhaps the best low-tech response to your question. The high-tech response is that there is a more general theorem called the Peter-Weil Theorem that identifies the relevant basis of L^2 for a compact lie group, apply it to the unit circle and you get $\sin$ and $\cos$ (it also tells you how you can find other basis). –  Ryan Budney Jan 14 '10 at 16:21
9  
@Ryan, I believe that it is weyl, not Weil. –  Anweshi Jan 14 '10 at 16:29
show 3 more comments

4 Answers 4

up vote 12 down vote accepted

$1$. Mathematical reason.

There is one reason which makes the basis of complex exponentials look very natural, and the reason is from complex analysis. Let $f(z)$ be a complex analytic function in the complex plane, with period $1$.

Then write the substitution $q = e^{2\pi i z}$. This way the analytic function $f$ actually becomes a meromorphic function of $q$ around zero, and $z = i \infty$ corresponds to $q = 0$. The Fourier expansion of $f(z)$ is then nothing but the Laurent expansion of $f(q)$ at $q = 0$.

Thus we have made use of a very natural function in complex analysis, the exponential function, to see the periodic function in another domain. And in that domain, the Fourier expansion is nothing but the Laurent expansion, which is a most natural thing to consider in complex analysis.

Here you can make suitable modifications when $f$ is periodic in some domain which is not the whole complex plane. In that case in the $q$-domain, $f$ will be analytic in some circle around $0$, and you can use that to get a Laurent expansion. The modular forms for instance are defined only in the upper-half plane, and what we get here is called the $q$-expansion.

However from the point of view of Real analysis, $L^p$-spaces etc., any other base would do just as fine as the complex exponentials. The complex exponentials are special because of complex analytic reasons.

$2$. Physical reason.

There are historical reasons also. For instance, in electrical engineering or theory of waves, it is very useful to decompose a function into its frequency components and this is the reason for the great importance of Fourier analysis in electrical engineering or in electrical communication theory. The impedance offered by circuits depends on the frequency of the signal that is being fed in, and a circuit consisting of capacitors, inductors etc. react differently to different frequencies, and thus the sine/cosine wave decomposition is very natural from a physical point of view. And it was from this context, and also the theory of heat conduction, that Fourier analysis developed up.

share|improve this answer
8  
The physical reason is a mathematical reason. In a basis of complex exponentials the derivative is diagonalised, and so in this basis the properties of resistors, capacitors and inductors can be described by elementary linear equations rather than by differential equations. –  Dan Piponi Jan 14 '10 at 18:35
    
Oh that is good to know. I always wondered why. Thanks for pointing out. –  Anweshi Jan 14 '10 at 19:29
    
Maybe you or Qiaochu should write that down as an answer? –  Anweshi Jan 14 '10 at 19:30
add comment

Nobody mentioned that $e^{2\pi inz}$ are the characters of $S^1$.

share|improve this answer
1  
That's implicit in mentioning the Peter-Weyl theorem, I guess. –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Mar 8 '10 at 3:08
add comment

Sines and cosines can also be thought of as the special case of harmonic functions (i.e. Laplacian eigenfunctions) on the real line; harmonic functions can be used to form a natural basis for L2 functions on many spaces.

share|improve this answer
add comment

because {cos x,cos 2x,...,cos nx,...sin x,sin 2x,...,sin nx,...}form a group of bases of an orthogonal.These bases have a lot of characterization.You can find them easily in any reference book. May it help!

share|improve this answer
3  
This reason is already mentioned in the question. What was being asked is why does one choose this basis and not any other one for FT. –  Gjergji Zaimi Mar 7 '10 at 17:28
    
I think the most basic reason is that cos$^2$s+sin$^2$=1 –  Gu Yejun Aug 17 '10 at 15:35
    
which stands for a unit disk –  Gu Yejun Aug 17 '10 at 15:36
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.