Let $E_{a,b}^{r}, F_{a,b}^{r}$ be two (co)homologica first quadrant spectral sequences of vector spaces over a field $K$, and $f : E \to F$ be a morphism of spectral sequences.
Assume that morphisms $f_{a,b}^{1} : E_{a,b}^{1} \to F_{a,b}^{1}$ of the first page are all isomoprhisms.
If the numbers of non-zero terms appearing in the first pages of $E$ and $F$ are finite, then one can show that the following equation holds:
$\prod_{n}(\det (f_{n}))^{(-1)^{n}} = \prod_{a,b}(\det (f_{a,b}^{1}))^{(-1)^{a+b}}$.
Here, $f_{n}$ denotes the morphism $f_{n} : E_{n} \to F_{n}$, where $E_{n}$ and $F_{n}$ are the $n$th terms to which $E$ and $F$ converge(i.e. $E_{n}$ is a vector space equipped with filtration whose $i$th congruent is isomorphic to $E^{\infty}_{i,n-i}$).
(In order to define $\det$, one has to fix bases, or assume $F=E$ and $f$ is an endomorphism of $E$.)
My question is :
QUESTION
Assume that $E_{n}$ and $F_{n}$ are zero for any $n$ large enough.
Then, the left hand side of the above equation is well-defined.
If the numbers of non-zero terms appearing in the first pages of $E$ and $F$ are not necessarily finite, is there any way to calculate the left hand side by using $f_{a,b}^{1}$s?
If so, then how can it be done?
Maybe
this question can be essentially reduced to the following:
Let $C_{\ast}$ be a chain complex of $K$-vector spaces of the form $\cdots \to A_{2} \to A_{1} \to A_{0} \to 0$.
And let $f_{\ast} : C_{\ast} \to C_{\ast}$ be an endomorphism of the chain complex $C_{\ast}$.
Assume that the homology $H_{n}(C_{\ast})$ is zero for any $n>>0$.
Then, enoting by $H_{n}(f_{\ast})$ the homomorphism $H_{n}(C_{\ast}) \to H_{n}(C_{\ast})$ induced by $f$, the alternating product $\prod_{n} \det (H_{n}(f_{\ast}))^{(-1)^{n}}$ is well-defined if each $\det (H_{n}(f_{\ast}))$ is non-zero.
Under this situation, can the alternating product $\prod_{n} \det (H_{n}(f_{\ast}))^{(-1)^{n}}$ be expressed as "$\prod_{n}\det (f_{n})^{(-1)^{n}}$"?
The latter product is a priori an infinite product, so one will need to make some modifications.
Please give me any advice.